使用场景
扫描代码库以发现可利用漏洞 准备 Huntr、HackerOne 或类似赏金平台的提交材料 判断"这个漏洞是否真的能获得赏金"而非"理论上是否不安全"的优先级分类
affaan-m/ECC
Review security-bounty-hunter's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/security-bounty-hunter"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Limited to facts supported by the pinned source
当目标是针对负责任披露或赏金提交的实际漏洞发现,而非广泛的实践审查时使用此方法。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/security-bounty-hunter"The pinned source contains about 52 English words and 13 usable sections. That evidence supports a source profile, not a complete guide.
52 source words · 13 usable sections
What the source actually contains
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
扫描代码库以发现可利用漏洞 准备 Huntr、HackerOne 或类似赏金平台的提交材料 判断"这个漏洞是否真的能获得赏金"而非"理论上是否不安全"的优先级分类
优先关注远程可达、用户可控的攻击路径,并剔除平台通常判定为信息性或超出范围的模式。
Review the “有效模式” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Choose a different workflow
Hunt for exploitable, bounty-worthy security issues in repositories. Focuses on remotely reachable vulnerabilities that qualify for real reports instead of noisy local-only findings.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailReview security-bounty-hunter's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/security-bounty-hunter". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Hunt for exploitable, bounty-worthy security issues in repositories. Focuses on remotely reachable vulnerabilities that qualify for real reports instead of noisy local-only findings.
Review security-bounty-hunter's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
当目标是针对负责任披露或赏金提交的实际漏洞发现,而非广泛的实践审查时使用此方法。
优先关注远程可达、用户可控的攻击路径,并剔除平台通常判定为信息性或超出范围的模式。
以下是持续具有影响力的漏洞类型:
| 模式 | CWE | 典型影响 |
|---|---|---|
| 通过用户可控URL的SSRF | CWE-918 | 内网访问、云元数据窃取 |
| 中间件或API防护中的认证绕过 | CWE-287 | 未授权账户或数据访问 |
| 远程反序列化或上传至RCE路径 | CWE-502 | 代码执行 |
| 可达端点中的SQL注入 | CWE-89 | 数据泄露、认证绕过、数据破坏 |
| 请求处理程序中的命令注入 | CWE-78 | 代码执行 |
| 文件服务路径中的路径遍历 | CWE-22 | 任意文件读取或写入 |
| 自动触发的XSS | CWE-79 | 会话窃取、管理员权限沦陷 |
除非项目另有说明,以下通常属于低信号或超出赏金范围:
pickle.loads、torch.load 或等效且无远程路径的漏洞eval() 或 exec()shell=Truesemgrep --config=auto --severity=ERROR --severity=WARNING --json
然后手动过滤:
## 描述
[漏洞是什么及其重要性]
## 漏洞代码
[文件路径、行号范围及代码片段]
## 概念验证
[最小化可运行的请求或脚本]
## 影响
[攻击者能够实现的目标]
## 受影响版本
[已测试的版本、提交或部署目标]
提交前需确认: