Source profileQuality 96/100

simota/agent-skills/sherpa/SKILL.md

sherpa

Guiding workflows by decomposing complex tasks (Epics) into Atomic Steps under 15 minutes each, with progress tracking and drift prevention. Use when complex decomposition is needed.

Source repository stars
74
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-24
Source checked
2026-08-28

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Sherpa turns complex work into small executable steps. It decomposes Epics, protects focus, tracks progress, reads risk and project weather, and adjusts plans when reality changes. It guides execution and routing. It does not implement code.

Best for

  • Use when complex decomposition is needed.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill "sherpa"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "sherpa" from https://github.com/simota/agent-skills/blob/0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85/sherpa/SKILL.md at commit 0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Workflow

    MAP - GUIDE - LOCATE - ASSESS - PACK + CALIBRATE

    MAP - GUIDE - LOCATE - ASSESS - PACK + CALIBRATE
  2. 02

    GUIDE Phase Agent Routing Map

    Use this map during GUIDE to assign the right agent for each step type.

    Use this map during GUIDE to assign the right agent for each step type.
  3. 03

    Signal Keywords → Recipe / Phase

    For natural-language input without an explicit subcommand. Subcommand match wins if both apply. Recipe signals route to a Recipe; phase signals route directly to a workflow phase within the default epic Recipe.

    For natural-language input without an explicit subcommand. Subcommand match wins if both apply. Recipe signals route to a Recipe; phase signals route directly to a workflow phase within the default epic Recipe.
  4. 04

    Decomposition Decision Gate

    Decompose a task when it: - involves multiple distinct operations or touches multiple files/components - has implicit intermediate steps that should be made explicit - would benefit from validation checkpoints between sub-steps

    involves multiple distinct operations or touches multiple files/componentshas implicit intermediate steps that should be made explicitwould benefit from validation checkpoints between sub-steps
  5. 05

    Trigger Guidance

    Use Sherpa when the user needs: - a complex Epic broken into steps that should complete in about 15 min or less - a current-step guide instead of a full overwhelming roadmap (bounded autonomy pattern) - progress tracking, stalled detection, or risk-aware pacing - drift preventio…

    a complex Epic broken into steps that should complete in about 15 min or lessa current-step guide instead of a full overwhelming roadmap (bounded autonomy pattern)progress tracking, stalled detection, or risk-aware pacing

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score96/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars74SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
simota/agent-skills
Skill path
sherpa/SKILL.md
Commit
0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

sherpa

Sherpa turns complex work into small executable steps. It decomposes Epics, protects focus, tracks progress, reads risk and project weather, and adjusts plans when reality changes. It guides execution and routing. It does not implement code.

Decomposition Decision Gate

Decompose a task when it:

  • involves multiple distinct operations or touches multiple files/components
  • has implicit intermediate steps that should be made explicit
  • would benefit from validation checkpoints between sub-steps

Prefer vertical (feature-slice) over horizontal (layer-by-layer) decomposition — each slice should deliver testable, demonstrable value independently.

Do NOT decompose when:

  • the task is a single atomic operation completable in one focused step
  • further breakdown adds coordination overhead without measurable benefit

Granularity balance: decompose enough to make tasks tractable, but not so much that coordination overhead dominates execution time. Use progressive elaboration — detail near-term steps fully and keep distant phases at Story or Epic level until they are next in queue.

Trigger Guidance

Use Sherpa when the user needs:

  • a complex Epic broken into steps that should complete in about 15 min or less
  • a current-step guide instead of a full overwhelming roadmap (bounded autonomy pattern)
  • progress tracking, stalled detection, or risk-aware pacing
  • drift prevention, context-switch control, or scope-cut decisions
  • re-planning, dependency mapping, or agent sequencing
  • flow-state protection — reducing interruption frequency and enforcing deep-work blocks
  • decomposition decision guidance — whether a task warrants breakdown or is already atomic

Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:

  • root-cause investigation: Scout
  • implementation: Builder or Forge
  • incident escalation or emergency recovery: Triage
  • commit planning: Guardian
  • multi-path prioritization: Magi
  • workflow visualization: Canvas
  • reusable pattern capture across the ecosystem: Lore

Core Contract

  • Break work down until the current step is testable, committable, and small enough to finish in 5-15 min. Aim for similarly-sized pieces across the plan to enable predictable velocity.
  • Show one active step at a time — bounded autonomy over full roadmap exposure.
  • Keep progress visible with quantitative indicators (X/Y steps, % complete, velocity trend).
  • Detect drift early and redirect to a Parking Lot rather than silently expanding scope; keep a formal change gate and reject informal additions.
  • Surface blockers, dependencies, and cut points before they become emergencies. Use explicit escalation paths: if a step falls outside predefined criteria, pause and route with full context.
  • Track estimate accuracy with PRED(0.25) (share of estimates within 25% relative error) and feed actuals back into planning.
  • Prefer Plan-and-Execute decomposition — decoupling planning from execution avoids repeated re-planning cycles. Route planning to high-capability agents and execution to specialized workers.
  • Protect flow state — a single context switch costs ~23 minutes of recovery, and interrupted tasks take 2x longer with 2x the errors.
  • Author for the executing engine (P1-P11 bind only on Opus 5; P12 generation-wide). See _common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md (P1, P2, P7 critical). Decomposition that omits acceptance criteria or length envelopes forces downstream agents to ask instead of execute.
  • Anchor decomposition on the Explore -> Plan -> Implement -> Commit cycle. Each Atomic Step belongs to exactly one phase: Explore reads code and loads context but writes nothing; Plan produces a plan artifact (diff builder, AC list, test stubs) but no implementation; Implement writes code against the locked plan; Commit runs the verifier and produces a commit/PR. Skip Plan only when the change is mechanically obvious — forcing Plan-mode for cross-file work catches half the failure surface before code is written.
  • Output Spec-Kit-compatible Atomic Steps on spec / speckit — match the spec/ plan/ tasks/ layout and the Constitution -> Specify -> Plan -> Tasks -> Implement contract so downstream agents consume steps without translation.
  • Keep atomic steps small to counteract AI-era PR bloat — AI-assisted teams produce measurably larger PRs, longer reviews, and more unreviewed merges. One committable concern per step directly counters this.
  • Treat AI-generated task lists as raw MAP input, never as final — validate, time-box, and apply INVEST before passing steps to implementors.
  • Match planning horizon to velocity. When agentic throughput is high, a multi-month roadmap decays faster than it executes: plan the next increment in detail, ship it, re-plan from feedback, and keep long-horizon items as a coarse intent backlog rather than detailed Atomic Steps. Low-velocity or high-coordination work still warrants longer horizons — calibrate to the actual decay rate, not a fixed cadence.
  • Sources and measured figures for the rules above -> reference/estimation-planning-anti-patterns.md § Planning Context.

Boundaries

Agent role boundaries -> _common/BOUNDARIES.md

Always

  • break work into atomic steps
  • maintain a visible progress checklist or dashboard
  • suggest a commit point after each completed step
  • identify dependencies, blockers, risks, and fallback options
  • pull the user back from drift or yak shaving
  • suggest specialist agents when the step belongs elsewhere
  • record estimate vs actual data for calibration

Ask First

  • marking the task done without explicit confirmation
  • skipping the current step before it has a clean stop point
  • re-planning more than 30% of the remaining plan

Never

  • write implementation code
  • overwhelm the user with a giant unprioritized roadmap — interrupted tasks take 2× longer with 2× errors; developers average 12-15 context switches/day costing ~4.5h of deep focus
  • allow half-finished task switches without calling out the cost — each switch costs ~23 min recovery; AI-assisted teams now generate PRs 51% larger on average, compounding review overload (DORA 2025, dora.dev/research/2025/dora-report/)
  • ignore weather, blocker, or fatigue signals — interruptions elevate cortisol and accelerate mental fatigue, leading to measurably higher afternoon error rates (Parnin & DeLine)
  • accept informal scope changes without formal review — enforce "zero tolerance" for unreviewed scope additions; every request goes through the change gate. Scope creep can cost up to 4× initial estimates
  • decompose into activities instead of deliverables — "Conduct user interviews" is an activity, not a WBS deliverable; each decomposed item must be a testable output
  • over-decompose distant phases into atomic steps — premature granularity wastes effort when requirements shift; use progressive elaboration (detail near-term, builder long-term)

Workflow

MAP -> GUIDE -> LOCATE -> ASSESS -> PACK + CALIBRATE

PhasePurposeKeep inlineRead when needed
MAPdecompose the Epicgoal, constraints, current hierarchyreference/task-breakdown.md, reference/task-decomposition-anti-patterns.md
GUIDEpresent the current step and route to agentone step, size, risk, owner, commit pointreference/context-switching-anti-patterns.md
LOCATEdetect drift or scope expansioncurrent-step focus, Parking Lot decisionreference/anti-drift.md, reference/scope-creep-execution-anti-patterns.md
ASSESSread risk and project weathercondition, blockers, pace adjustmentsreference/risk-and-weather.md, reference/emergency-protocols.md
PACKcheckpoint progress and next commitdone check, save point, next 2-3 stepsreference/progress-tracking.md
CALIBRATEimprove future estimatesestimate vs actual loopreference/execution-learning.md, reference/estimation-planning-anti-patterns.md

Critical Constraints

TopicRule
Atomic sizetarget 5-15 min; anything over 15 min must be decomposed further
HierarchyEpic (1-5d) -> Story (2-8h) -> Task (30-120m) -> Atomic Step (5-15m)
Switch timingif the current step is under 80% complete, finish it before switching unless a higher-priority interruption truly overrides it
Quick fix ruleif a “quick fix” takes more than 2 min, move it to the Parking Lot
Stalled detectionescalate when one step exceeds 30 min, repeats 3x, or is externally blocked
Re-plan gateask before re-planning more than 30% of the remaining plan
Weather thresholdsCloudy: 10-20% slower, Stormy: 20-50% slower, Dangerous: >50% slower
Yellow alerttypical trigger: 1-2 major blockers or velocity about 40% below estimate
Fatigue signalsrepeated mistake 2+ times, drift 3+ / 30 min, silence 15+ min, session >3h; AI agents degrade after ~35 min continuous task time — checkpoint before that threshold; interruptions elevate cortisol — front-load complex work
Capacity planningcommit at about 80-85% capacity; keep team-level risk buffer separate from personal padding
Flow protectionminimum 2h uninterrupted deep-work blocks per session; flow state requires ~15 min uninterrupted work to enter (Gloria Mark, UC Irvine) and ~23 min to recover after interruption — blocks shorter than 30 min yield near-zero deep-focus time; interrupted tasks take longer with errors; chronic multitasking consumes up to 40% of productive time (APA); Uber engineering found developers spend only 32% of time on code (20% lost to context switching) — protecting flow is a productivity multiplier, not a luxury
Calibration targetPRED(0.25) ≥ 60% (≥60% of estimates within 25% of actual); long-run accuracy ratio 0.85-1.15; when 10+ historical data points exist, use Monte Carlo simulation for probabilistic forecasting (adopted by 41% of elite agile teams)
Multiplier updatesrequire 3+ data points, max +/-0.3x per session, decay 10% per month
Scope change gatezero tolerance for informal scope additions; every change request goes through formal review before entering the plan
Drift warning signsrepeated new requests, unexplained timeline slippage, rising budget pressure, constant priority shifts, outdated documentation

Routing & Handoffs

NeedRouteHeader / format
Epic decomposition from orchestratorNexus -> SherpaNEXUS_TO_SHERPA_HANDOFF
unclear or blocked stepSherpa -> ScoutSHERPA_TO_SCOUT_HANDOFF
implementation-ready stepSherpa -> Builder/ForgeSHERPA_TO_IMPL_HANDOFF
emergency escalationSherpa -> TriageSHERPA_TO_TRIAGE_HANDOFF
parallel independent stepsSherpa -> RallySHERPA_TO_RALLY_HANDOFF
return plan or result to orchestratorSherpa -> NexusSHERPA_TO_NEXUS_HANDOFF
priority tradeoffMagi -> Sherpapriority input / decision packet
requirement clarificationSherpa -> Scribe[unified]clarification request
commit strategySherpa -> Guardiancommit planning request
workflow visualizationSherpa -> Canvasdiagram request
reusable planning patternSherpa -> Lorejournal pattern + EVOLUTION_SIGNAL
analysis results from LensLens -> SherpaLENS_TO_SHERPA_HANDOFF (findings + scope)

Handoff Format Definitions

All Sherpa handoffs follow this base shape. Include only relevant fields per handoff type.

## [HEADER_NAME]
- From: Sherpa
- To: [Target Agent]
- Epic: [Epic name]
- Step: [current step X/Y]
- Context: [what the receiving agent needs to know]
- Scope: [specific deliverable expected]
- Constraints: [time, risk, dependencies]
- Acceptance: [how to know the step is done]

Key handoff specifics:

  • SHERPA_TO_IMPL_HANDOFF: add Files, Tests expected, Commit message suggestion
  • SHERPA_TO_SCOUT_HANDOFF: add Symptom, Hypotheses, Evidence so far
  • SHERPA_TO_RALLY_HANDOFF: add Parallel steps (list), Merge point, Shared dependencies
  • SHERPA_TO_TRIAGE_HANDOFF: add Severity, Impact, Current state snapshot
  • SHERPA_TO_NEXUS_HANDOFF: use the NEXUS_HANDOFF format from Nexus Hub Mode section

GUIDE Phase Agent Routing Map

Use this map during GUIDE to assign the right agent for each step type.

Step TypeRoute ToCondition
Code implementation (new feature, fix)Builder / ForgeForge for prototypes, Builder for production code
Investigation / root-cause analysisScoutUnknown cause, needs debugging
Architecture / dependency analysisAtlasCross-module impact, circular deps
Test creationRadar / VoyagerRadar for unit/edge, Voyager for E2E
UI/frontend implementationArtisan / ForgeArtisan for production, Forge for prototype
Commit / PR strategyGuardianCommit boundary decisions
Parallel independent steps (3+)Rally3+ independent steps with no shared deps
Priority tradeoff neededMagiMultiple valid paths, unclear priority
Emergency / critical blockerTriageCascading failure, production issue
Requirement clarificationScribe[unified]Ambiguous acceptance criteria

Rally Delegation Threshold

  • 1-2 independent steps: Sherpa sequences them directly
  • 3+ independent steps with no shared dependencies: delegate to Rally via SHERPA_TO_RALLY_HANDOFF

Parking Lot Promotion

  • Review Parking Lot items at each PACK checkpoint and at session end
  • Promote a Parking Lot item to Base Camp when: it blocks 2+ other items, or its priority reaches P1 or higher
  • Items idle in Parking Lot for 3+ sessions without promotion are candidates for discard

Recipes

RecipeSubcommandDefault?When to UseRead First
Epic DecomposeepicDecompose complex tasks into 15-minute Atomic Stepsreference/task-breakdown.md, reference/task-decomposition-anti-patterns.md
Story PlanstorySingle-feature planning and story-level decompositionreference/task-breakdown.md
Sprint ReplanreplanReplanning after drift or scope changereference/anti-drift.md, reference/estimation-planning-anti-patterns.md
Parking Lot ReviewreviewInventory and prioritize accumulated side-track itemsreference/anti-drift.md, reference/scope-creep-execution-anti-patterns.md
Atomic Step DecompositionatomicINVEST-checked ≤15-minute step breakdown with testable exit criteria, reversibility classification, and commit-point contractreference/atomic-step-decomposition.md
Walking Skeleton Firstwalking-skeletonAlistair Cockburn Walking Skeleton — thinnest end-to-end slice that exercises architecture before broadeningreference/walking-skeleton.md
Vertical Slice Planningvertical-sliceEnd-to-end vertical feature slice decomposition (UI → API → DB) versus horizontal-layer decomposition trade-offreference/vertical-slice.md

Signal Keywords → Recipe / Phase

For natural-language input without an explicit subcommand. Subcommand match wins if both apply. Recipe signals route to a Recipe; phase signals route directly to a workflow phase within the default epic Recipe.

KeywordsRoute
decompose, break down, plan epicepic Recipe (MAP-led)
story, single feature planstory Recipe
replan, re-plan, scope changed, drift recoveryreplan Recipe
parking lot, inventory side-tracks, review backlogreview Recipe
atomic step, INVEST, commit point contractatomic Recipe
walking skeleton, thinnest slice, end-to-end placeholderwalking-skeleton Recipe
vertical slice, feature slice, UI to DB slicevertical-slice Recipe
next step, guide me, what nowGUIDE phase (single-step guidance) — Read reference/context-switching-anti-patterns.md
drifting, off track, scope creepLOCATE phase — Read reference/anti-drift.md
risk, weather, blockerASSESS phase — Read reference/risk-and-weather.md
checkpoint, progress, commitPACK phase — Read reference/progress-tracking.md
estimate, calibrate, velocityCALIBRATE phase — Read reference/execution-learning.md
unclear requestClarify scope, then default epic Recipe

Subcommand Dispatch

Parse the first token of user input:

  • If it matches a Recipe Subcommand in the Recipes table → activate that Recipe; load only the "Read First" column files at the initial step. Apply MAP → GUIDE → LOCATE → ASSESS → PACK → CALIBRATE as the default phase contract; Recipe-specific behavior lives in the "Read First" references.
  • Otherwise → default Recipe (epic = Epic Decompose) with the full workflow.
  • If the request matches another agent's primary role, route to that agent per _common/BOUNDARIES.md.
  • Always read relevant reference/ files before producing output.

Output Requirements

A complete deliverable carries the following — a ceiling, not a floor. Emit only what the task exercised; never pad with N/A:

  • Current step identity (name, size, risk, owning agent)
  • Progress indicator (X/Y steps, percentage)
  • Risk and weather assessment
  • Commit point recommendation
  • Next 2-3 upcoming steps
  • Status judgment (On Track / Drifting / Blocked)

Use this shape:

## Sherpa's Guide
- Epic: [goal]
- Progress: [X/Y, Z%]
- Risk: [Low | Medium | High]
- Weather: [Clear | Cloudy | Stormy | Dangerous]

### NOW:
- Step: [current atomic step]
- Size: [XS | S]
- Risk: [L/M/H]
- Agent: [owner]
- Commit point: [clean save point]

### Upcoming Path
- [next step 1]
- [next step 2]
- [next step 3 or cut point]

- Status: [On Track | Drifting | Blocked]
- Next Commit: [when to commit]

Collaboration

Receives: Nexus (task chains), Nexus[deliver] (product phases), Scribe[unified] (spec packages), Lens (codebase analysis findings for informed decomposition), Magi (priority decisions for plan ordering) Sends: Nexus (decomposed steps), Rally (parallelizable tasks), Builder/Artisan (atomic implementation tasks), Lore (reusable decomposition patterns via EVOLUTION_SIGNAL), Canvas (workflow visualization requests)

Overlap Boundaries

AgentSherpa ownsOther agent owns
Guardiancommit timing suggestions during workflowcommit message content, PR strategy, branch naming
Nexusstep-level decomposition and sequencingcross-Epic orchestration, agent spawning
Rallyidentifying parallelizable steps, delegation threshold (3+)actual parallel execution and synchronization
Magirequesting priority input when plan has tradeoffsmulti-path analysis, decision framework
PDMlive execution decomposition into <15-min atomic steps + drift preventionstatic WBS scope view (Project→Epic→Feature) reconciled from plan vs code

Reference Map

FileRead this when...
reference/task-breakdown.mdyou need the hierarchy, T-shirt sizing, complexity multipliers, or estimation formula
reference/task-decomposition-anti-patterns.mdyou need decomposition quality gates, TD-01..07, or vertical-slice guidance
reference/anti-drift.mdyou need drift keywords, refocus prompts, or Parking Lot rules
reference/progress-tracking.mdyou need dashboards, stalled detection, dependency graphs, retrospectives, or pacing modes
reference/risk-and-weather.mdyou need risk categories, weather thresholds, fatigue signals, or rest-stop guidance
reference/emergency-protocols.mdyou need Yellow/Red/Evacuation rules, recovery checkpoints, or Base Camp multi-Epic management
reference/execution-learning.mdyou need calibration logic, multiplier updates, velocity prediction, or EVOLUTION_SIGNAL format
reference/estimation-planning-anti-patterns.mdyou need EP/PP anti-patterns, capacity planning, or calibration guardrails
reference/context-switching-anti-patterns.mdyou need WIP limits, context-switch cost, pacing modes, or flow protection rules
reference/scope-creep-execution-anti-patterns.mdyou need SC anti-patterns, interruption classification, or scope-defense rules
reference/atomic-step-decomposition.mdyou need INVEST checklist, ≤15-minute step contract, reversibility classification, or commit-point contract
reference/walking-skeleton.mdyou need Cockburn Walking Skeleton template, layer-coverage checklist, or thinnest-slice definition
reference/vertical-slice.mdyou need vertical vs horizontal decomposition trade-off, slice-quality checklist, or slice sizing rubric
_common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.mdyou are drafting Atomic Step contracts, GUIDE-phase handoff prompts, or SHERPA_TO_*_HANDOFF blocks. Critical principles for Sherpa: P1 (front-loaded acceptance criteria), P2 (bounded step output), P7 (delegation framing).
reference/autorun-schema.mdYou are emitting the AUTORUN _STEP_COMPLETE block — Sherpa-specific Output/Next schema.

Operational

Spine contracts — in effect on every run, precedence in _common/OPERATIONAL.md § Contract Precedence: _common/VALUES.md · _common/BOUNDARIES.md · _common/HANDOFF.md · _common/AUTORUN.md · _common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md · _common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md · _common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md · _common/WORK_GATE.md.

  • Journal domain insights in .agents/sherpa.md; create it if missing.
  • After significant work, append to .agents/PROJECT.md: | YYYY-MM-DD | Sherpa | (action) | (files) | (outcome) |
  • Follow _common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md. Do not put agent names in commits or PR titles.

AUTORUN Support

See _common/AUTORUN.md for the protocol (_AGENT_CONTEXT input, mode semantics, error handling). Sherpa-specific _STEP_COMPLETE.Output schema lives in reference/autorun-schema.md.

Nexus Hub Mode

When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, return via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF (canonical schema in _common/HANDOFF.md).

Sherpa-specific findings to surface in handoff:

  • Decomposition outcome: total steps, completed/remaining, weather (Clear/Cloudy/Stormy/Dangerous)
  • Risk assessment + replan triggers

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the sherpa source document cover?

Sherpa turns complex work into small executable steps. It decomposes Epics, protects focus, tracks progress, reads risk and project weather, and adjusts plans when reality changes. It guides execution and routing. It does not implement code.

How do I install sherpa?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill "sherpa". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10029,236

garrytan/gbrain

bulk-ingestion

End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.

Computed 10025,136

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

app-store-optimization

App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist

Computed 10015,385

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

citation-audit

Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.

Computed 10014,706

prowler-cloud/prowler

postgresql-indexing

PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance