Source profileQuality 85/100Review permissions

martinholovsky/SOTA-skills/skills/sota-cli-ux/SKILL.md

sota-cli-ux

State-of-the-art CLI and developer-tool UX guidance (2026) covering command and flag design, output and interaction (stdout/stderr, --json, TTY detection, exit codes, prompts), runtime behavior and lifecycle (signals, dry-run, idempotency, XDG paths, completions, telemetry), and distribution (packaging, checksums, docs). Use when designing or building any command line tool, subcommand, TUI, or developer tool — in any framework (argparse, click, typer, clap, cobra, oclif, commander) — AND when au

Source repository stars
10
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-05
Source checked
2026-08-05

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

State-of-the-art CLI and developer-tool UX guidance (2026) covering command and flag design, output and interaction (stdout/stderr, --json, TTY detection, exit codes, prompts), runtime behavior and lifecycle (signals, dry-run, idempotency, XDG paths, completions, telemetry), and distribution (packaging, checksums, docs).

Best for

  • Expert-level rules for building and auditing command-line tools: the grammar of commands/flags/args, config layering, human-vs-machine output, TTY-aware interaction, exit codes, signal handling, lifecycle behavior, and…

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/martinholovsky/SOTA-skills --skill "skills/sota-cli-ux"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "sota-cli-ux" from https://github.com/martinholovsky/SOTA-skills/blob/7c8ae3e03ba5c8ec3292c581d92d458035240f4c/skills/sota-cli-ux/SKILL.md at commit 7c8ae3e03ba5c8ec3292c581d92d458035240f4c. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Purpose

    Expert-level rules for building and auditing command-line tools: the grammar of commands/flags/args, config layering, human-vs-machine output, TTY-aware interaction, exit codes, signal handling, lifecycle behavior, and distribution. The core thesis: a CLI has three users — a hum…

    Expert-level rules for building and auditing command-line tools: the grammar of commands/flags/args, config layering, human-vs-machine output, TTY-aware interaction, exit codes, signal handling, lifecycle behavior, and…
  2. 02

    BUILD mode

    When designing or implementing a CLI:

    Design the command grammar before writing code. Write the --help textDefaults carry the common path. A new user must get a useful result withSplit the streams from day one: primary output → stdout, everything else
  3. 03

    AUDIT mode

    When reviewing an existing CLI:

    Identify the surface: parser setup (argparse/clap/cobra/etc.), main/entryRun the tool, don't just read it. Minimum probe set:tool --help, tool -h, tool --version, tool definitelynotacmd
  4. 04

    Severity conventions

    Critical — corrupts data or destroys trust: destructive op with no

    Critical — corrupts data or destroys trust: destructive op with noHigh — breaks scripting or interrupts users: machine output polluted byMedium — erodes usability: missing long forms; required flags on common
  5. 05

    Finding format

    Order findings by severity; one finding per root cause; include the reproducing command line whenever the issue was observed by running the tool.

    Order findings by severity; one finding per root cause; include the reproducing command line whenever the issue was observed by running the tool.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Runs scripts

medium · line 122

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

**`--dry-run` on every mutating command**, printing the real plan through

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score85/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars10SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
martinholovsky/SOTA-skills
Skill path
skills/sota-cli-ux/SKILL.md
Commit
7c8ae3e03ba5c8ec3292c581d92d458035240f4c
License
CC-BY-4.0
Collected
2026-08-05
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

SOTA CLI & Developer-Tool UX

Purpose

Expert-level rules for building and auditing command-line tools: the grammar of commands/flags/args, config layering, human-vs-machine output, TTY-aware interaction, exit codes, signal handling, lifecycle behavior, and distribution. The core thesis: a CLI has three users — a human at a TTY, a script in CI, and an AI agent driving the tool (a stricter script) — and every design decision must serve all three without flags-gymnastics. Rules are imperative with rationale and good/bad terminal examples; every rules file ends with an audit checklist. Load only the files relevant to the task via the index below.

BUILD mode

When designing or implementing a CLI:

  1. Design the command grammar before writing code. Write the --help text first: subcommand tree, every flag (short + long), args, examples. If the help is hard to write, the grammar is wrong (rules/01).
  2. Defaults carry the common path. A new user must get a useful result with zero flags. Anything required for the 80% case is a design bug (rules/01 §3).
  3. Split the streams from day one: primary output → stdout, everything else (logs, progress, prompts, errors) → stderr. Retrofitting this breaks users' pipes (rules/02 §1).
  4. Make it pipe-safe by default: detect TTY; disable color/progress/prompts when piped; honor NO_COLOR; ship --json with every listing/reading command from v0.1, because output format is API (rules/02).
  5. Treat exit codes, flags, env vars, and JSON shapes as a public API: document them, version them, deprecate — never repurpose or remove without a cycle (rules/02 §3, rules/03 §7).
  6. Build the unhappy paths with the happy path: Ctrl-C cleanup, --dry-run on mutating commands, re-runnable/resumable operations, stdin-closed CI behavior, offline behavior (rules/03).
  7. Plan distribution early: single static binary if the ecosystem allows, checksums + signatures, completions and man page generated from the same source as --help (rules/03 §8, rules/04).
  8. Before declaring done, run every relevant Audit checklist against your own tool, including the brutal smoke test: tool cmd | cat, tool cmd > out.txt 2> err.txt, tool cmd < /dev/null, echo $?.

AUDIT mode

When reviewing an existing CLI:

  1. Identify the surface: parser setup (argparse/clap/cobra/etc.), main/entry point, output and error paths, signal handlers, config loading, install/ release scripts. Load the matching rules files.
  2. Run the tool, don't just read it. Minimum probe set:
    • tool --help, tool <sub> -h, tool --version, tool definitelynotacmd
    • tool list | cat and tool list | head -1 (color codes? broken pipe panic?)
    • tool list > /dev/null — does anything still reach the human? (it should, on stderr)
    • tool mutate < /dev/null — hang waiting for a prompt = CI killer
    • echo $? after success, after a usage error, after a real failure
    • Ctrl-C mid-operation: prompt state restored? partial state cleaned or resumable?
  3. Then verify in code what can't be probed: config precedence order, secret handling, temp/state file locations, update/telemetry behavior.

Severity conventions

  • Critical — corrupts data or destroys trust: destructive op with no confirmation/--force and no dry-run; non-zero work reported as exit 0 (or vice versa) so CI lies; prompt hangs forever with stdin closed; secrets echoed to terminal/logs/argv; auto-update or telemetry without disclosure.
  • High — breaks scripting or interrupts users: machine output polluted by ANSI codes/log lines on stdout; no --json on listing commands; SIGINT leaves corrupt partial state; undocumented/colliding exit codes; config precedence nondeterministic; breaking flag removal without deprecation.
  • Medium — erodes usability: missing long forms; required flags on common path; no progress on >2s ops; errors without remediation; $HOME dotfile litter instead of XDG; no completions; no -q/-v; >500ms --help.
  • Low — polish: help without examples, no suggest-on-typo, inconsistent subcommand naming, missing man page, table borders in output.

Finding format

[SEVERITY] <one-line title>
Where: <file:line | command invocation that reproduces it>
Rule: <rules-file §section>
Issue: <what is wrong, with observed evidence (transcript or code)>
Impact: <who breaks: the human at the TTY, the script in CI, an agent driving the tool, or all>
Fix: <specific change; exact flag/stream/exit-code where load-bearing>

Order findings by severity; one finding per root cause; include the reproducing command line whenever the issue was observed by running the tool.

Rules index

FileRead this when...
rules/01-commands-flags-config.mdDesigning/auditing the command surface: subcommand grammar (noun-verb consistency), POSIX/GNU flag conventions, short/long forms, -- separator, args vs flags vs stdin, defaults, dangerous-op flags, config precedence chain, env var naming, help text quality, suggest-on-typo.
rules/02-output-interaction.mdAnything the tool prints or asks: stdout vs stderr contract, --json/--plain, TTY detection, color and NO_COLOR/TERM, exit codes as API, streaming vs buffering, progress indication, prompts and --yes/CI behavior, quiet/verbose levels, error message anatomy, --debug vs stack traces, agent-facing design (--fields, confirmation envelopes, frozen output contracts).
rules/03-behavior-lifecycle.mdRuntime behavior and tool lifecycle: startup latency, idempotent re-runnable commands, --dry-run, SIGINT/SIGTERM handling, crash-only resumable design, network-op responsiveness and offline behavior, self-update caution, telemetry consent, XDG base directories, shell completions, semantic versioning of the CLI surface.
rules/04-distribution-docs.mdShipping and documenting: single-binary packaging, install channels (brew/curl-script/registry) with checksums + signatures, docs generated from the --help source of truth, man pages, README quickstart, version pinning for CI.

Top-10 non-negotiables

  1. Primary output to stdout, everything else to stderr — logs, progress, prompts, warnings, errors. tool x | next must receive only data. (rules/02 §1)
  2. Pipe-safe by default: TTY-detect; no color, no spinners, no prompts when piped; honor NO_COLOR (set and non-empty) and TERM=dumb; --json on every command that lists or reads data. (rules/02 §2, §4)
  3. Exit 0 only on success; distinct, documented nonzero codes for usage error vs operational failure; never exit 0 after printing an error. (rules/02 §3)
  4. Every flag has a long form; short forms only for the frequent few; GNU/POSIX syntax (-f, --flag, --flag=value, -- ends flags). (rules/01 §2)
  5. No required flags on the common path — good defaults; and the reverse: destructive operations require explicit --force/typed confirmation on a TTY and refuse (don't hang) without one. (rules/01 §3, §5)
  6. Every prompt is skippable: --yes/--no-input equivalent exists; stdin closed or non-TTY ⇒ use default or fail fast with the flag to pass — never block CI. (rules/02 §6)
  7. Errors say what failed, why, and what to do next — path, value, and the exact command to run; stack traces only under --debug. (rules/02 §7)
  8. Ctrl-C is sacred: first SIGINT exits promptly with cleanup and exit code 130, second SIGINT force-quits; terminal state always restored; interrupted work is resumable or rolled back. (rules/03 §3)
  9. --dry-run on every mutating command, printing the real plan through the real code path. (rules/03 §2)
  10. The CLI surface is a semver'd API: flags, exit codes, JSON fields, env vars. Deprecate with warnings for a full cycle; never silently change meaning. Config precedence is exactly flags > env > project config > user config > defaults, documented. (rules/01 §6, rules/03 §7)

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9732,671

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

esm

Use when working directly with the `esm` Python SDK, ESM3 or ESMC model IDs, Forge/Biohub inference clients, or ESMFold2 folding workflows.

Computed 976

mgiovani/cc-arsenal

team-review

Multi-agent review team: architecture, security, performance, testing, style, docs/UX, plus an adversary that cross-examines the other 6, for security-sensitive, architectural, or large PRs (15+ files) where a single-agent pass risks missing cross-cutting issues. Use for auth/payments/PII changes, schema/pattern changes, compliance sign-off, or when asked to 'get the review team on this' / 'multi-agent review' / 'thorough review before merge'. For a standard PR or a quick pre-merge check, use /r

Computed 9515

eugenelim/agent-ready-repo

work-loop

Use when implementing or resuming a non-trivial repository change: a feature, behavior-changing fix, refactor, migration, framework or dependency upgrade, schema or API change, performance work, infrastructure or build-system change, reversion, or an existing build spec under `docs/specs/`. Also use for bare continuation commands ('resume', 'continue', 'keep going', 'pick up where I left off', 'let's get going') when conversation or workspace context identifies active build work. Do not use for

Computed 9438,502

wshobson/agents

architecture-decision-records

Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.