Source profileQuality 87/100

martinholovsky/SOTA-skills/skills/sota-identity-access/SKILL.md

sota-identity-access

State-of-the-art identity and access management engineering (2026) for BUILDING/configuring identity infrastructure AND AUDITING it — federation, IdPs, authorization models, the joiner-mover-leaver lifecycle, privileged/break-glass access, workload identity, MFA/passkeys, and assurance levels; audits cover orphaned accounts, over-privileged roles, weak MFA, long-lived tokens, and SAML misconfig. Owns identity INFRASTRUCTURE and access-management DESIGN, not app-level login/session/JWT mechanics

Source repository stars
10
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-05
Source checked
2026-08-05

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

State-of-the-art identity and access management engineering (2026) for BUILDING/configuring identity infrastructure AND AUDITING it — federation, IdPs, authorization models, the joiner-mover-leaver lifecycle, privileged/break-glass access, workload identity, MFA/passkeys, and assurance levels; audits cover orphaned accounts, over-privileged roles, weak MFA,…

Best for

  • App-level authn ceremony (password storage/argon2id, session cookie flags,
  • App-level object/function authz (IDOR/BOLA in one service's handlers): that is
  • Secret storage, OIDC-federation mechanics for workloads, JWT kid rotation as a

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/martinholovsky/SOTA-skills --skill "skills/sota-identity-access"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "sota-identity-access" from https://github.com/martinholovsky/SOTA-skills/blob/7c8ae3e03ba5c8ec3292c581d92d458035240f4c/skills/sota-identity-access/SKILL.md at commit 7c8ae3e03ba5c8ec3292c581d92d458035240f4c. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Sweep procedure

    1. Enumerate the IdP config: clients/relying parties and their redirect URIs, client-auth methods, token lifetimes, grant types enabled, signing keys + rotation, session/SLO config, MFA policy, federation/brokering trusts. Pull from the IdP API or config export, not screenshots.…

    Enumerate the IdP config: clients/relying parties and their redirect URIs,Enumerate the population: every human and service account, itsSweep by rules file: 01 (protocol/token misconfig), 02 (IdP hardening),
  2. 02

    Purpose

    Own the identity infrastructure and access-management design of a system: the federation protocols themselves, the IdP that issues and validates tokens, the authorization model that decides who may do what, the lifecycle that creates and destroys access, privileged access, and m…

    App-level authn ceremony (password storage/argon2id, session cookie flags,App-level object/function authz (IDOR/BOLA in one service's handlers): that isSecret storage, OIDC-federation mechanics for workloads, JWT kid rotation as a
  3. 03

    BUILD mode

    Use when standing up or configuring any identity component.

    Pick the protocol, not the vibe. Interactive user login → OIDC AuthorizationTreat the IdP as a tier-0 asset. HA, backups of the identity store, restrictedDesign the authorization model deliberately. RBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC is an
  4. 04

    AUDIT mode

    Use when assessing an existing identity estate.

    Enumerate the IdP config: clients/relying parties and their redirect URIs,Enumerate the population: every human and service account, itsSweep by rules file: 01 (protocol/token misconfig), 02 (IdP hardening),
  5. 05

    Severity conventions

    Review the “Severity conventions” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Severity conventions” source section.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score87/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars10SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
martinholovsky/SOTA-skills
Skill path
skills/sota-identity-access/SKILL.md
Commit
7c8ae3e03ba5c8ec3292c581d92d458035240f4c
License
CC-BY-4.0
Collected
2026-08-05
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

SOTA Identity & Access

Purpose

Own the identity infrastructure and access-management design of a system: the federation protocols themselves, the IdP that issues and validates tokens, the authorization model that decides who may do what, the lifecycle that creates and destroys access, privileged access, and machine identity. Two modes. In BUILD mode you stand up or configure this infrastructure correctly by default. In AUDIT mode you assess an existing identity estate against the same rules and report severity-rated findings. The rules files are the single source of truth for both.

Boundary discipline — this skill does not re-teach what siblings own:

  • App-level authn ceremony (password storage/argon2id, session cookie flags, WebAuthn ceremony, JWT signature validation mechanics at one RP): that is sota-code-security rules/02. This skill owns the protocol and the IdP side.
  • App-level object/function authz (IDOR/BOLA in one service's handlers): that is sota-code-security rules/03. This skill owns the authorization model and the policy engine that the app calls.
  • Secret storage, OIDC-federation mechanics for workloads, JWT kid rotation as a credential operation: sota-secrets-management rules/01 and rules/05.

Concurrent siblings to invoke alongside: sota-network-security (mTLS, ZTNA, identity-aware proxy), sota-kubernetes (K8s RBAC, OIDC to the API server, SA tokens), sota-detection-engineering (identity-based detections, impossible-travel, auth anomaly), sota-privacy-compliance (consent, DSAR, audit evidence).

The hierarchy of preference, always: (1) no standing credential — short-lived, federated, sender-constrained tokens; (2) standing identity with strong phishing-resistant authentication and just-in-time elevation; (3) long-lived secret-authenticated client with rotation and audit; (4) anything static and broadly-scoped is a defect to be justified or removed.

BUILD mode

Use when standing up or configuring any identity component.

  1. Pick the protocol, not the vibe. Interactive user login → OIDC Authorization Code + PKCE (the only sanctioned interactive flow). Service-to-service → client credentials with private_key_jwt/mTLS, or workload identity federation. High assurance → FAPI 2.0. Legacy SAML only where a relying party requires it. Read rules/01-federation-protocols.md before configuring any client.
  2. Treat the IdP as a tier-0 asset. HA, backups of the identity store, restricted admin plane, signing-key rotation, break-glass design. rules/02-idp-operations.md.
  3. Design the authorization model deliberately. RBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC is an architecture decision; model roles/relationships and write policy as code with a test matrix. rules/03-authorization-models.md.
  4. Wire the lifecycle before launch. Joiner-mover-leaver, SCIM provisioning AND deprovisioning, access reviews. Deprovisioning is the #1 IAM failure — design it first. rules/04-lifecycle-provisioning.md.
  5. Separate and time-box privilege. Admin-account separation, JIT elevation, logged-and-alerted break-glass, machine identity. rules/05-privileged-workload.md.
  6. Make authentication phishing-resistant and adaptive. Passkeys/FIDO2 at the IdP, step-up, CAEP/SSF for continuous evaluation. rules/06-mfa-federation-assurance.md.
  7. Self-review against each file's Audit checklist before declaring done.

AUDIT mode

Use when assessing an existing identity estate.

Sweep procedure

  1. Enumerate the IdP config: clients/relying parties and their redirect URIs, client-auth methods, token lifetimes, grant types enabled, signing keys + rotation, session/SLO config, MFA policy, federation/brokering trusts. Pull from the IdP API or config export, not screenshots.
  2. Enumerate the population: every human and service account, its authentication strength, last-login, group/role assignments, and owner. Cross against the HR/source-of-truth roster to find orphans.
  3. Sweep by rules file: 01 (protocol/token misconfig), 02 (IdP hardening), 03 (over-privilege/SoD), 04 (orphaned/dormant/no-reviews — usually the most findings), 05 (break-glass/standing admin/static workload creds), 06 (weak MFA).
  4. Verify, don't assume: a wildcard redirect URI, an account that logged in 400 days ago, a role granting * — confirm each against the live config/logs before reporting. Never authenticate as a discovered account or trigger break-glass without explicit permission.

Severity conventions

SeverityDefinitionExamples
CriticalIdentity-layer flaw enabling full account/tenant takeover or auth bypass for many principalsWildcard/loose redirect_uri enabling token theft; IdP accepts unsigned SAML assertions or alg:none; standing super-admin with no MFA; signing key never rotated and leaked; OIDC issued to an open-redirect client
HighCompromise of a single privileged identity, or systemic over-grantOrphaned admin account still active post-termination; break-glass account with a static shared password and no alerting; role granting estate-wide *; long-lived non-rotating refresh tokens; SSO with no Single Logout on credential change
MediumWeak lifecycle/assurance on a contained scopeNo access reviews/recertification; dormant non-priv accounts; phishable MFA (SMS/TOTP) where phishing-resistant is feasible; client_secret_basic where private_key_jwt/mTLS is supported; missing SoD on sensitive role pairs
LowHygiene and defense-in-depth gapsNo idle session timeout; consent screen not informative; no dormant-account detection job; PAR/DPoP available but unused for a low-risk client; missing azp validation on a single-audience token
InfoObservations and accepted riskLegacy SAML RP documented and owner-acknowledged; planned migration off SMS MFA tracked

Finding format

Report every finding as one line, ordered Critical → Info:

file:line | rule | severity | effort (trivial/small/medium/large) | fix

Where file:line anchors to the offending config (e.g. keycloak/realm.json:412, policies/rbac.rego:88, or idp://clients/web-app#redirect_uris for live config with no file). rule is the rules-file section (e.g. 01 §redirect-uri). Group repeated instances of one weakness into a single finding listing all locations. End the audit with: counts per severity, the orphaned/dormant account tally, and the top 3 systemic fixes (almost always: deprovisioning automation, MFA hardening, least-privilege roles).

Rules index

FileRead this when...
rules/01-federation-protocols.mdConfiguring or auditing OIDC/OAuth flows, choosing a grant type, validating tokens at the RP, PKCE/PAR/RAR/JAR/DPoP, OAuth 2.1 & FAPI 2.0, SAML and its attack classes (XSW, comment injection, unsigned assertions), SCIM as a protocol, redirect-URI matching, token-validation pitfalls
rules/02-idp-operations.mdRunning a self-hosted IdP (Kanidm/Keycloak/Authentik/Zitadel), client/RP registration discipline, client-auth ladder, token lifetimes + refresh rotation + reuse detection, signing-key (kid) rotation, session management + Single Logout, consent, multi-IdP brokering, IdP as tier-0 (HA/backup)
rules/03-authorization-models.mdChoosing/designing RBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC, role modeling and role explosion, the group→role mapping discipline, least privilege + segregation of duties, policy-as-code engines (OPA/Rego, Cedar, OpenFGA, SpiceDB), policy testing, birthright vs requested access
rules/04-lifecycle-provisioning.mdDesigning or auditing joiner-mover-leaver, SCIM-driven provisioning/deprovisioning, the orphaned-account problem, access reviews/recertification, just-in-time provisioning, dormant-account detection
rules/05-privileged-workload.mdAdmin-account separation, break-glass design (logged/time-bound/alerted, the Kanidm recover-account pattern), JIT/just-enough elevation, session recording, vaulting; machine/workload identity (SPIFFE/SPIRE, workload identity federation, mTLS identity, short-lived over static)
rules/06-mfa-federation-assurance.mdPhishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2/passkeys/WebAuthn at the IdP), step-up/adaptive/conditional access, CAEP/SSF continuous evaluation, push-bombing/MFA-fatigue defenses, B2B/B2C/social-login and account-linking risks, identity proofing and NIST 800-63-4 IAL/AAL/FAL
rules/07-active-directory.mdHardening on-prem Active Directory / Kerberos / ADCS: Enterprise Access Model & tiering (ESAE/red-forest retired), delegation risks (unconstrained/constrained/RBCD), Kerberoasting/AS-REP + gMSA/dMSA & AES-only service accounts, SPN hygiene, machine-account quota, NTLM relay (SMB/LDAP signing + channel binding), ADCS ESC classes + template/enrollment-agent hardening + strong cert mapping (KB5014754), LAPS/Protected Users/Credential Guard/auth silos, krbtgt rotation, hybrid Entra sync boundary (PHS/PTA). Detection lives in sota-detection-engineering rules/07

Top-10 non-negotiables

Violations are findings regardless of context; in BUILD mode they are never shortcuts.

  1. Authorization Code + PKCE is the only sanctioned interactive flow. Implicit and ROPC/password grant are dead and disabled at the IdP. (rules/01)
  2. Exact redirect-URI matching, no wildcards, no scheme/host/path looseness. A loose redirect_uri is a token-exfiltration primitive. (rules/01)
  3. At the RP, pin algorithms and validate iss, aud, exp, and nonce; reject unsigned tokens and alg:none. SAML RPs reject unsigned assertions and validate the signature over the whole response with anti-XSW canonicalization. (rules/01)
  4. The IdP is a tier-0 asset: HA, backed-up identity store, restricted admin plane, rotating signing keys with kid overlap, no standing super-admin without phishing-resistant MFA. (rules/02)
  5. Refresh tokens rotate with reuse detection, or are sender-constrained (DPoP/mTLS); access tokens are short-lived. No non-expiring tokens. (rules/01, rules/02)
  6. Authorization is least-privilege by an explicit model with policy-as-code and a tested allow/deny matrix. No role grants estate-wide *; segregation of duties enforced on sensitive pairs. (rules/03)
  7. Group→role mapping is explicit and default-deny: a user with no matching mapping gets no access, never a silent default role. (rules/03)
  8. Deprovisioning is automated and prompt — a leaver loses all access within the agreed SLA, source-of-truth driven via SCIM; access is recertified on a schedule. Deprovisioning is the #1 IAM failure. (rules/04)
  9. Privileged access is separated, just-in-time, and time-boxed; break-glass is logged, alerted, and expires. No permanent quiet admin backdoor. (rules/05)
  10. Phishing-resistant MFA (FIDO2/passkeys) at the IdP for all privileged and, ideally, all users; step-up for sensitive operations; SMS/voice OTP is not phishing-resistant. (rules/06)

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10043,034

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

ab-testing

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

Computed 100165

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

suede-ab-testing

Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).

Computed 1007

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace

design-analysis

Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "

Computed 1007

event4u-app/agent-config

existing-ui-audit

Use BEFORE writing or editing any non-trivial UI — inventories components, design tokens, shadcn primitives, and reusable patterns into state.ui_audit. Hard gate for the ui directive set.