Source profileQuality 81/100

Jeffallan/claude-skills/skills/sre-engineer/SKILL.md

sre-engineer

Defines service level objectives, creates error budget policies, designs incident response procedures, develops capacity models, and produces monitoring configurations and automation scripts for production systems. Use when defining SLIs/SLOs, managing error budgets, building reliable systems at scale, incident management, chaos engineering, toil reduction, or capacity planning.

Source repository stars
10,762
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-05-20
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Defines service level objectives, creates error budget policies, designs incident response procedures, develops capacity models, and produces monitoring configurations and automation scripts for production systems.

Best for

  • Use when defining SLIs/SLOs, managing error budgets, building reliable systems at scale, incident management, chaos engineering, toil reduction, or capacity planning.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill "skills/sre-engineer"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "sre-engineer" from https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills/blob/e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319/skills/sre-engineer/SKILL.md at commit e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Core Workflow

    1. Assess reliability - Review architecture, SLOs, incidents, toil levels 2. Define SLOs - Identify meaningful SLIs and set appropriate targets 3. Verify alignment - Confirm SLO targets reflect user expectations before proceeding 4. Implement monitoring - Build golden signal das…

    Assess reliability - Review architecture, SLOs, incidents, toil levelsDefine SLOs - Identify meaningful SLIs and set appropriate targetsVerify alignment - Confirm SLO targets reflect user expectations before proceeding
  2. 02

    Reference Guide

    Load detailed guidance based on context:

    Load detailed guidance based on context:
  3. 03

    Constraints

    Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)

    Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)Calculate error budgets from SLO targetsMonitor golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation)
  4. 04

    MUST DO

    Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)

    Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)Calculate error budgets from SLO targetsMonitor golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation)
  5. 05

    MUST NOT DO

    Set SLOs without user impact justification

    Set SLOs without user impact justificationAlert on symptoms without actionable runbooksTolerate 50% toil without automation plan

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Network access

medium · line 94

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/high-error-burn"

Network access

medium · line 109

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/slow-error-burn"

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score81/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars10,762SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
Jeffallan/claude-skills
Skill path
skills/sre-engineer/SKILL.md
Commit
e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

SRE Engineer

Core Workflow

  1. Assess reliability - Review architecture, SLOs, incidents, toil levels
  2. Define SLOs - Identify meaningful SLIs and set appropriate targets
  3. Verify alignment - Confirm SLO targets reflect user expectations before proceeding
  4. Implement monitoring - Build golden signal dashboards and alerting
  5. Automate toil - Identify repetitive tasks and build automation
  6. Test resilience - Design and execute chaos experiments; verify recovery meets RTO/RPO targets before marking the experiment complete; validate recovery behavior end-to-end

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
SLO/SLIreferences/slo-sli-management.mdDefining SLOs, calculating error budgets
Error Budgetsreferences/error-budget-policy.mdManaging budgets, burn rates, policies
Monitoringreferences/monitoring-alerting.mdGolden signals, alert design, dashboards
Automationreferences/automation-toil.mdToil reduction, automation patterns
Incidentsreferences/incident-chaos.mdIncident response, chaos engineering

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)
  • Calculate error budgets from SLO targets
  • Monitor golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation)
  • Write blameless postmortems for all incidents
  • Measure toil and track reduction progress
  • Automate repetitive operational tasks
  • Test failure scenarios with chaos engineering
  • Balance reliability with feature velocity

MUST NOT DO

  • Set SLOs without user impact justification
  • Alert on symptoms without actionable runbooks
  • Tolerate >50% toil without automation plan
  • Skip postmortems or assign blame
  • Implement manual processes for recurring tasks
  • Deploy without capacity planning
  • Ignore error budget exhaustion
  • Build systems that can't degrade gracefully

Output Templates

When implementing SRE practices, provide:

  1. SLO definitions with SLI measurements and targets
  2. Monitoring/alerting configuration (Prometheus, etc.)
  3. Automation scripts (Python, Go, Terraform)
  4. Runbooks with clear remediation steps
  5. Brief explanation of reliability impact

Concrete Examples

SLO Definition & Error Budget Calculation

# 99.9% availability SLO over a 30-day window
# Allowed downtime: (1 - 0.999) * 30 * 24 * 60 = 43.2 minutes/month
# Error budget (request-based): 0.001 * total_requests

# Example: 10M requests/month → 10,000 error budget requests
# If 5,000 errors consumed in week 1 → 50% budget burned in 25% of window
# → Trigger error budget policy: freeze non-critical releases

Prometheus SLO Alerting Rule (Multiwindow Burn Rate)

groups:
  - name: slo_availability
    rules:
      # Fast burn: 2% budget in 1h (14.4x burn rate)
      - alert: HighErrorBudgetBurn
        expr: |
          (
            sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h]))
            /
            sum(rate(http_requests_total[1h]))
          ) > 0.014400
          and
          (
            sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
            /
            sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
          ) > 0.014400
        for: 2m
        labels:
          severity: critical
        annotations:
          summary: "High error budget burn rate detected"
          runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/high-error-burn"

      # Slow burn: 5% budget in 6h (1x burn rate sustained)
      - alert: SlowErrorBudgetBurn
        expr: |
          (
            sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[6h]))
            /
            sum(rate(http_requests_total[6h]))
          ) > 0.001
        for: 15m
        labels:
          severity: warning
        annotations:
          summary: "Sustained error budget consumption"
          runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/slow-error-burn"

PromQL Golden Signal Queries

# Latency — 99th percentile request duration
histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) by (le, service))

# Traffic — requests per second by service
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)

# Errors — error rate ratio
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])) by (service)
  /
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)

# Saturation — CPU throttling ratio
sum(rate(container_cpu_cfs_throttled_seconds_total[5m])) by (pod)
  /
sum(rate(container_cpu_cfs_periods_total[5m])) by (pod)

Toil Automation Script (Python)

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Auto-remediation: restart pods exceeding error threshold."""
import subprocess, sys, json

ERROR_THRESHOLD = 0.05  # 5% error rate triggers restart

def get_error_rate(service: str) -> float:
    """Query Prometheus for current error rate."""
    import urllib.request
    query = f'sum(rate(http_requests_total{{status=~"5..",service="{service}"}}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total{{service="{service}"}}[5m]))'
    url = f"http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query={urllib.request.quote(query)}"
    with urllib.request.urlopen(url) as resp:
        data = json.load(resp)
    results = data["data"]["result"]
    return float(results[0]["value"][1]) if results else 0.0

def restart_deployment(namespace: str, deployment: str) -> None:
    subprocess.run(
        ["kubectl", "rollout", "restart", f"deployment/{deployment}", "-n", namespace],
        check=True
    )
    print(f"Restarted {namespace}/{deployment}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    service, namespace, deployment = sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2], sys.argv[3]
    rate = get_error_rate(service)
    print(f"Error rate for {service}: {rate:.2%}")
    if rate > ERROR_THRESHOLD:
        restart_deployment(namespace, deployment)
    else:
        print("Within SLO threshold — no action required")

Documentation

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9831,966

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

dask

Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.

Computed 9831,966

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

medchem

Medicinal chemistry filters for compound triage. Apply drug-likeness rules (Lipinski, Veber, CNS), structural alert catalogs (PAINS, NIBR, ChEMBL), complexity metrics, and the medchem query language for library filtering.

Computed 9831,966

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

neurokit2

Use NeuroKit2 to build or audit reproducible research workflows for physiological time-series preprocessing, event/interval analysis, multimodal alignment, variability, and complexity. Trigger when code imports neurokit2 or needs its current APIs, schemas, and method-aware validation—not for diagnosis or device validation.

Computed 9637,126

github/awesome-copilot

flowstudio-power-automate-mcp

Foundation skill for Power Automate via FlowStudio MCP — auth setup, the reusable MCP helper (Python + Node.js), tool discovery via `list_skills` / `tool_search`, and oversized-response handling. Load this skill first when connecting an agent to Power Automate. For specialized workflows, load `flowstudio-power-automate-build`, `flowstudio-power-automate-debug`, `flowstudio-power-automate-monitoring` (Pro+), or `flowstudio-power-automate-governance` (Pro+) — each contains the workflow narrative,