Best for
- Use when deciding what to publish, why it deserves resources, and how the portfolio compounds.
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/skills/suede-content-strategy/SKILL.md
Suede-owned content-strategy discipline for audience questions, content pillars, topic clusters, editorial priorities, cadence, distribution, refreshes, and stop-doing decisions. Use when deciding what to publish, why it deserves resources, and how the portfolio compounds. NOT FOR: writing an individual asset (use suede-copy), technical or on-page SEO audits (use suede-seo-audit), or social-channel production (use suede-social).
Decision brief
Use this Suede content-strategy playbook to plan evidence-backed content that earns search, sharing, trust, or qualified demand.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill "skills/suede-content-strategy"Inspect the Agent Skill "suede-content-strategy" from https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/blob/e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7/skills/suede-content-strategy/SKILL.md at commit e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
1. Product-led: What problems does your product solve? 2. Audience-led: What does your ICP need to learn? 3. Search-led: What topics have volume in your space? 4. Competitor-led: What are competitors ranking for?
Map topics to the buyer's journey using proven keyword modifiers:
Modifiers: "what is," "how to," "guide to," "introduction to"
Modifiers: "best," "top," "vs," "alternatives," "comparison"
Modifiers: "pricing," "reviews," "demo," "trial," "buy"
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 165 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Use this Suede content-strategy playbook to plan evidence-backed content that earns search, sharing, trust, or qualified demand.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
Every piece of content must be searchable, shareable, or both. Prioritize in that order—search traffic is the foundation.
Searchable content captures existing demand. Optimized for people actively looking for answers.
Shareable content creates demand. Spreads ideas and gets people talking.
Use-Case Content Formula: [persona] + [use-case]. Targets long-tail keywords.
Hub and Spoke Hub = comprehensive overview. Spokes = related subtopics.
/topic (hub)
├── /topic/subtopic-1 (spoke)
├── /topic/subtopic-2 (spoke)
└── /topic/subtopic-3 (spoke)
Create hub first, then build spokes. Interlink strategically.
Note: Most content works fine under /blog. Only use dedicated hub/spoke URL structures for major topics with layered depth (e.g., Atlassian's /agile guide). For typical blog posts, /blog/post-title is sufficient.
Template Libraries High-intent keywords + product adoption.
Thought Leadership
Data-Driven Content
Expert Roundups A selected set of relevant, verified experts answering one specific question. Distribution depends on contributor permission and actual promotion.
Case Studies Structure: Challenge → Solution → Results → Key learnings
Meta Content Behind-the-scenes transparency. "How We Got Our First $5k MRR," "Why We Chose Debt Over VC."
For programmatic content at scale, route the data and template system to
suede-programmatic-seo.
Content pillars are the 3-5 core topics your brand will own. Each pillar spawns a cluster of related content.
Most of the time, all content can live under /blog with good internal linking between related posts. Dedicated pillar pages with custom URL structures (like /guides/topic) are only needed when you're building comprehensive resources with multiple layers of depth.
Pillar Topic (Hub)
├── Subtopic Cluster 1
│ ├── Article A
│ ├── Article B
│ └── Article C
├── Subtopic Cluster 2
│ ├── Article D
│ ├── Article E
│ └── Article F
└── Subtopic Cluster 3
├── Article G
├── Article H
└── Article I
Good pillars should:
Map topics to the buyer's journey using proven keyword modifiers:
Modifiers: "what is," "how to," "guide to," "introduction to"
Example: If customers ask about project management basics:
Modifiers: "best," "top," "vs," "alternatives," "comparison"
Example: If customers evaluate multiple tools:
Modifiers: "pricing," "reviews," "demo," "trial," "buy"
Example: If pricing comes up in sales calls:
Modifiers: "templates," "examples," "tutorial," "how to use," "setup"
Example: If support tickets show implementation struggles:
Before external research, inspect the tools and connected sources that are currently callable and authorized in this session. Use product analytics, Search Console or keyword exports, customer material, support data, approved Drive sources, or a callable browser/search surface only when access actually exists. Record each source URL or file, owner, retrieval date, and relevant scope.
If no external research surface is available, continue with user-supplied URLs, exports, transcripts, and known first-party evidence. Otherwise return a compact manual-research list with exact queries and fields to capture. Label hypotheses and unverified competitor observations; never imply that a search was run.
If user provides keyword exports (Ahrefs, SEMrush, GSC), analyze for:
Output as prioritized table: | Keyword | Volume | Difficulty | Buyer Stage | Content Type | Priority |
If user provides sales or customer call transcripts, extract:
Output content ideas with supporting quotes.
If user provides survey data, mine for:
If an authorized browser or search surface is currently callable, use it to find recent first-party community evidence. Otherwise ask for relevant URLs or provide the queries below for manual collection.
Reddit: site:reddit.com [topic]
Quora: site:quora.com [topic]
Other: Indie Hackers, Hacker News, Product Hunt, industry Slack/Discord
For each item, capture the source URL, publication date, retrieval date, community context, and a short evidence excerpt. Distinguish engagement signals from proof of customer demand.
Use a currently callable, authorized browser/search surface or user-supplied competitor URLs. If neither is available, produce a manual research checklist and do not invent page inventories, rankings, engagement, or gaps.
Find their content: site:competitor.com/blog
Analyze:
Identify hypotheses to validate:
Extract from customer-facing teams:
Score each idea on four factors. The weights below are an illustrative starting point, not a universal truth; change them to match the user's business goal and record the chosen decision rule.
| Idea | Customer Impact (40%) | Content-Market Fit (30%) | Search Potential (20%) | Resources (10%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topic A | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8.0 |
| Topic B | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7.1 |
When creating a content strategy, provide:
For each recommended piece:
Visual or structured representation of how content interconnects.
suede-copy.suede-seo-audit.suede-programmatic-seo.suede-emails or suede-social.suede-content-strategy.Alternatives
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Use it for deployment and seo audit tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Use when the user asks to "build programmatic SEO pages", "generate pages at scale", "rank on a high-authority third-party site", "borrow domain authority", "build a vs / alternative page", "do local SEO", "optimize a Google Business Profile", or "fix NAP" — one page-build router with four modes: programmatic (template × dataset systems), parasite (barnacle publishing on Medium/Reddit/LinkedIn/GitHub), comparison (vs / alternative pages in four formats), and local (GBP + NAP + citations + locati
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Full content production pipeline — takes a topic from blank page to published-ready piece. Use when you need to execute content: write a blog post, article, or guide end-to-end. Triggers: 'write a post about', 'draft an article', 'create content for', 'help me write', 'I need a blog post'. NOT for content strategy or calendar planning (use content-strategy). NOT for repurposing existing content (use content-repurposing). NOT for social captions only.
MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli
Backlink + distribution checklist that expands a site's KD ceiling beyond what on-page work alone can earn. Use when the user mentions 'backlinks', 'off-page SEO', 'directory submissions', 'guest posts', 'outreach targets', 'link building', 'submit to directories', 'get listed in listicles', 'Product Hunt launch backlinks', or asks 'how do I get more domain authority'. Generates a prioritized, researched target list across directories, listicles, and guest-post candidates — does NOT submit anyth