Source profileQuality 97/100

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/skills/suede-prospecting/SKILL.md

suede-prospecting

Suede-owned prospecting and qualification discipline. Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence. NOT FOR: sending outreach (use suede-cold-email), changing CRM routing (use suede-revops), or profiling competitors instead of prospects (use suede-competitor-profiling).

Source repository stars
165
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-04
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Suede Prospecting turns an approved ICP into a source-backed, scored lead sheet across B2B SaaS, general B2B, local business, and early demand-signal motions. Every candidate carries qualification evidence, disqualification logic, and a compliance-aware handoff before outreach b…

Best for

  • Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence.

Not for

  • Starting discovery without an ICP. Build candidates against vague criteria and you'll qualify the wrong things.
  • Treating data sources as authoritative without cross-checks. Apollo and ZoomInfo are out of date often; verify before scoring as "Hot."

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill "skills/suede-prospecting"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "suede-prospecting" from https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/blob/e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7/skills/suede-prospecting/SKILL.md at commit e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Phase 1 — Define the ICP

    Pull from product-marketing.md if available. Otherwise, gather:

    Firmographic fit — industry, company size, revenue band, geography, business modelTechnographic fit (SaaS branch) — what tools they already use, what they're missingBuying signal — why now? (trigger event, funding, hiring, new initiative, dissatisfaction with current vendor, recent move/expansion)
  2. 02

    Phase 2 — Build the candidate list (discovery)

    Start with a bounded candidate sample sized to the requested output, source access, and review capacity. Expand only when observed disqualification rates show that another batch is needed.

    SaaS / B2B: cross-check material claims across available first-party,Local SMB: use an authorized research connector or manual public-sourceStart with a bounded candidate sample sized to the requested output, source access, and review capacity. Expand only when observed disqualification rates show that another batch is needed.
  3. 03

    Phase 3 — Qualify each candidate

    Score every candidate against the ICP checklist. Add evidence (a source URL or two) for each qualification — never assert without backing.

    High: confirmed by at least two independent sources or official business pageMedium: one credible source plus consistent search evidenceLow: incomplete or ambiguous evidence — flag what remains uncertain
  4. 04

    Phase 4 — Score and prioritize

    Apply this rubric for the SaaS, B2B, and Local SMB branches. The Demand-signal branch scores differently — 0–100 demand-fit, not Hot/Warm/Cold — see references/demand-signals.md.

    Apply this rubric for the SaaS, B2B, and Local SMB branches. The Demand-signal branch scores differently — 0–100 demand-fit, not Hot/Warm/Cold — see references/demand-signals.md.Branch-specific signals refine the scoring — see each reference file. Let the evidence determine the number in each label; never force a Hot/Warm/Cold quota.
  5. 05

    Phase 5 — Output the lead sheet

    (SaaS / B2B / Local SMB. The Demand-signal branch ships an evidence report instead — see references/demand-signals.md.)

    score, business/company name, contact (where applicable), why-it's-a-prospect, source(s), confidence, last verified date(SaaS / B2B / Local SMB. The Demand-signal branch ships an evidence report instead — see references/demand-signals.md.)Default to a markdown table in chat. Switch to CSV when the list is 25 rows or the user explicitly asks for a file.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score97/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars165SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Skill path
skills/suede-prospecting/SKILL.md
Commit
e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Suede Prospecting

Suede Prospecting turns an approved ICP into a source-backed, scored lead sheet across B2B SaaS, general B2B, local business, and early demand-signal motions. Every candidate carries qualification evidence, disqualification logic, and a compliance-aware handoff before outreach begins.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Pick the Branch

Prospecting motions differ enough that the workflow forks at intake. Pick one branch based on who the user is selling to:

BranchSell toWhat "qualified" looks likePossible sources after access and terms checks
SaaSOther SaaS companies / digital businessesICP fit + tech stack match + growth signals (funding, hiring, product velocity)Public company sites, directories, developer sources, or licensed data available to the user
B2BNon-SaaS B2B (services, manufacturers, enterprises, mid-market)Industry + size + geographic fit + buying signals (trigger events, vendor changes)Public company records, industry directories, or licensed business data available to the user
Local SMBLocal small businesses (shops, gyms, restaurants, clinics, salons, services)Active business + website status + proximity + decision-maker accessPublic business sites and manually reviewed listings allowed by their terms
Demand-signalEarly-stage: first customers, design partners, or beta usersA cited public pain, demand, or timing signal, not just firmographic fitPublic forums, reviews, issues, posts, jobs, and launch records reachable with current authorized tools or manual review

Before using any named platform or vendor, discover what is currently callable, authenticated, authorized, and permitted by its terms. If no research connector or browser is available, give the user a manual source checklist and work from URLs, exports, screenshots, or source text they provide.

If the user describes a hybrid motion (e.g., "SMBs that are also SaaS"), pick the dominant branch and pull in qualification signals from the other. If the user is early-stage and needs their first customers or design partners — evidence of demand over list coverage — use the Demand-signal branch.

For the branch-specific deep dives:


Shared Framework (all branches)

Every prospecting engagement follows the same five phases. Tools and qualification signals change per branch; the phases don't.

Phase 1 — Define the ICP

Pull from product-marketing.md if available. Otherwise, gather:

  1. Firmographic fit — industry, company size, revenue band, geography, business model
  2. Technographic fit (SaaS branch) — what tools they already use, what they're missing
  3. Buying signal — why now? (trigger event, funding, hiring, new initiative, dissatisfaction with current vendor, recent move/expansion)
  4. Decision-maker profile — role, seniority, what they care about
  5. Disqualifiers — what makes a prospect a clear "skip"

Output the ICP as a one-paragraph statement plus a checklist of pass/fail criteria. Don't move to discovery without this.

Phase 2 — Build the candidate list (discovery)

Start with a bounded candidate sample sized to the requested output, source access, and review capacity. Expand only when observed disqualification rates show that another batch is needed.

  • SaaS / B2B: cross-check material claims across available first-party, public, or licensed sources. Named vendors are candidates only after access, freshness, terms, and cost checks.
  • Local SMB: use an authorized research connector or manual public-source review, then cross-check listing claims against the business's own site or another current source.

A smaller evidence-complete list is preferable to padding the output with unverified candidates.

Phase 3 — Qualify each candidate

Score every candidate against the ICP checklist. Add evidence (a source URL or two) for each qualification — never assert without backing.

Confidence levels (used across all branches):

  • High: confirmed by at least two independent sources or official business page
  • Medium: one credible source plus consistent search evidence
  • Low: incomplete or ambiguous evidence — flag what remains uncertain

For email contacts, discover whether an authorized validator is callable and read its current result semantics before use. If none is available, label the address unverified, keep it out of send-ready exports, and provide a user-operated validation checklist. Never claim that validation guarantees delivery.

Phase 4 — Score and prioritize

Apply this rubric for the SaaS, B2B, and Local SMB branches. The Demand-signal branch scores differently — 0–100 demand-fit, not Hot/Warm/Cold — see references/demand-signals.md.

ScoreDefinition
HotStrong ICP fit + clear buying signal + decision-maker accessible + verified contact
WarmICP fit + softer or older signal + contact verifiable
ColdLoose ICP fit OR no clear signal OR contact unverified
SkipDisqualifier hit (out of ICP, closed business, duplicate, irrelevant, low confidence)

Branch-specific signals refine the scoring — see each reference file. Let the evidence determine the number in each label; never force a Hot/Warm/Cold quota.

Phase 5 — Output the lead sheet

(SaaS / B2B / Local SMB. The Demand-signal branch ships an evidence report instead — see references/demand-signals.md.)

Default to a markdown table in chat. Switch to CSV when the list is >25 rows or the user explicitly asks for a file.

After the table, add "Priority review candidates" when the evidence supports one or more: a bounded set ranked by current signal strength, with one sentence on what was verified and what still needs review.

Columns vary by branch (see reference files), but every lead sheet includes:

  • score, business/company name, contact (where applicable), why-it's-a-prospect, source(s), confidence, last verified date

Compliance Guardrails

These apply to every branch. Read first, every engagement.

  1. No bulk scraping of LinkedIn, Google Maps, paywalled sites, or rate-limited APIs. Browser is an assisted research tool, not a scraper.
  2. No CAPTCHA, login wall, or bot protection bypass. If a site requires it, work with what's publicly visible.
  3. Public business contact channels only. Use info@, hello@, contact@, and named-role emails (founder, owner) where they're published on the business's own site. Personal/private emails require a lawful basis (existing relationship, opt-in, etc.).
  4. GDPR / CAN-SPAM / CASL aware. Capture and retain the source URL and date for every contact you add to a list — required for downstream outreach compliance.
  5. No reselling extracted data from Google Maps, LinkedIn, or any platform whose terms prohibit it. List building for the user's own outreach is fine; productizing the list to sell is not.
  6. Rate limit yourself. Even on public sources, space requests. Don't fingerprint as a bot.
  7. No breached, leaked, or unprovenanced data. Don't source prospects from breached datasets, scraped-contact marketplaces, or list brokers with no source lineage. Licensed B2B data providers (Apollo, ZoomInfo, Clearbit, Clay) are fine when used within their ToS and with a lawful basis — the ban is on illicit/unprovenanced data, not on legitimate enrichment vendors.
  8. Never target or infer sensitive traits. Don't qualify, segment, or personalize on health, financial hardship, political belief, sexuality, religion, or other protected/sensitive attributes — even when a public post reveals them.

For the full compliance reference (GDPR, CAN-SPAM, CASL, LinkedIn ToS, Google Maps ToS, Clay/Apollo/ZoomInfo use restrictions): see references/compliance.md.


Inputs to Collect

If missing, ask once, then infer reasonable defaults and continue:

  • Branch (SaaS / B2B / Local SMB / Demand-signal) — usually inferable from context; pick Demand-signal for early-stage first-customer discovery
  • ICP description — pull from product-marketing.md if present
  • Target count — use the requested count or propose a bounded pilot justified by source coverage and review capacity
  • Geography (essential for Local SMB; useful for B2B; less critical for SaaS)
  • Tools the user has access to — discover current callable tools and authenticated accounts; never assume a vendor connector or browser exists
  • Output format — chat table (default) or CSV
  • Buying signal preference — what triggers should they prioritize? (funding rounds, hiring, recent move, etc.)

Tool Selection Quick Picks

Full breakdown in references/data-sources.md. Quick picks:

Treat every named product below as a candidate, not an available capability. Discover currently callable tools and verify the user's authenticated access, license, source terms, and cost first.

If the user has access to...Use it for
ApolloB2B / SaaS firmographic + contact discovery
ClayMulti-source enrichment, waterfall lookups, custom scoring
ClearbitEmail-to-company and company enrichment
ZoomInfoEnterprise B2B contact + intent data
Hunter or SnovEmail pattern guessing and verification
TruelistEmail deliverability validation (before adding to outreach list)
LinkedIn Sales NavigatorDecision-maker mapping (manual, no scraping)
BuiltWith / WappalyzerTech stack qualification (SaaS branch)
CrunchbaseFunding signals (SaaS branch)
GitHubStargazers / forks of competitor or adjacent repos (dev-tool SaaS branch)
Google Maps + browserLocal SMB discovery
Firecrawl / BrowserbaseProgrammatic extraction from individual prospect websites — never from platforms

If the user has no enrichment or browser tools: provide exact public-source queries and a qualification worksheet, then work from URLs, exports, or screenshots the user supplies.


Output Formats

Default — chat table

For SaaS / B2B (≤25 rows):

| Score | Company | Industry | Size | Signal | Contact | Email status | Source | Confidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

For Local SMB (≤15 rows) — port from the local-prospector reference:

| Score | Business | Category | Area | Website status | Website/Social | Phone | Why it's a prospect | Confidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

CSV — when >25 rows or user requests a file

SaaS / B2B columns:

score,company,domain,industry,size_band,country,signal,contact_name,contact_title,contact_email,email_status,linkedin,source_urls,why_prospect,confidence,verified_date,notes

Local SMB columns:

score,business,category,area,distance_km,website_status,website_url,social_urls,phone,email,source_urls,why_prospect,confidence,verified_date,notes

Include after the table

  • Priority review candidates: a bounded evidence-ranked set with one-sentence rationale each
  • Search parameters: branch, ICP, location/radius, target count, date generated
  • Open questions: anything you couldn't verify and the user should look at

Quality Checks (before finalizing)

  • Remove duplicates (by domain for SaaS/B2B, by business + address for Local SMB)
  • Every "Hot" lead has a verified contact + at least one source URL
  • Email status comes from a currently authorized validator with documented result semantics, or is explicitly unverified; failed results stay in a separate invalid bucket
  • No lead labeled "Hot" lacks a clear buying signal
  • Confidence levels honest — "High" requires 2 independent sources, not just two of your own searches
  • No leads sourced from prohibited scraping (LinkedIn at scale, Google Maps bulk extract, etc.)
  • Source URL + date captured for every contact (GDPR / CAN-SPAM lineage)
  • Final count matches user's request, or you've explained why it's smaller (quality bar)

Common Mistakes

  1. Starting discovery without an ICP. Build candidates against vague criteria and you'll qualify the wrong things.
  2. Treating data sources as authoritative without cross-checks. Apollo and ZoomInfo are out of date often; verify before scoring as "Hot."
  3. Presenting unverified contacts as send-ready. Use an available authorized validator or keep the address labeled unverified with a manual validation handoff.
  4. Bulk scraping LinkedIn or Google Maps. Real risk: account suspension + ToS violation. Browser as an assisted tool only.
  5. Mixing branches. Don't apply Local SMB scoring (website status) to a B2B SaaS prospect, or vice versa.
  6. "Hot" labels without buying signals. ICP fit alone is not enough — the signal is what makes the timing right.
  7. No source URLs. Every claim should be traceable to a public source. Future outreach depends on this lineage.
  8. Ignoring quiet hours / time zone when scheduling the downstream outreach (handoff to suede-cold-email).
  9. Forgetting to retain consent / lineage records. Required for GDPR DSARs and CAN-SPAM audits.

Task-Specific Questions

  1. Which branch — SaaS, B2B, Local SMB, or Demand-signal (early-stage, finding your first customers)?
  2. What's your ICP? (Or: should I pull from your product-marketing context?)
  3. How many qualified leads do you want?
  4. Which research or validation tools are currently callable and authorized? If none, can you provide URLs, exports, or screenshots for manual review?
  5. What's the triggering buying signal you care most about?
  6. Geography or radius (Local SMB / B2B)?
  7. Chat table or CSV?

Tool Integrations

These are selection examples, not guaranteed integrations. Before using one, verify current vendor documentation, account access, pricing, data freshness, export rights, platform terms, and whether a callable connector is actually available in the current session.

ToolBest ForVerify Before Use
ApolloB2B / SaaS firmographic + contact discoveryFreshness, export terms, email validation
ClayMulti-source enrichment + waterfallCredit cost, providers, field provenance
ClearbitEmail-to-company enrichmentCurrent product access and coverage
ZoomInfoEnterprise B2B contact + intentLicense, export rights, signal freshness
Hunter / SnovEmail pattern discoveryVerification status and lawful basis
TruelistEmail deliverability validationResult meanings and current API limits
OutreachSales engagement after approvalSequence permissions and suppression rules
RB2BVisitor identificationPrivacy basis and company-vs-person grain
GitHubPublic developer-intent signalsAPI terms, rate limits, company mapping
Firecrawl / BrowserbaseSingle-target public-site researchTarget terms, scope, and session access

Boundaries

  • Do not send outreach, import contacts, buy data, mutate a CRM, or enroll a person in a sequence.
  • Do not invent contact details or qualification evidence, evade source terms, collect unnecessary personal data, or label a lead verified without a cited current source.
  • Do not decide legal compliance or claim deliverability. Apply the applicable consent, privacy, and suppression rules before any downstream contact.

Routing

  • Use suede-product-marketing to define the ICP and positioning context.
  • Use suede-cold-email after a qualified list is approved for outreach copy.
  • Use suede-revops for approved CRM routing and lifecycle handoff.
  • Use suede-sales-enablement for collateral used in active sales work.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9542,968

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

prospecting

When the user wants to find, qualify, and build a list of prospects to reach out to — across B2B SaaS, general B2B, or local small businesses. Also use when the user mentions "prospecting," "build a prospect list," "find prospects," "find leads," "lead gen list," "find SaaS companies that," "find B2B companies," "find local businesses," "ICP-fit accounts," "who should we go after," "outbound list," "target account list," "find clients near me," "businesses without websites," "prospect research,"

Computed 9342,968

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

emails

When the user wants to create or optimize an email sequence, drip campaign, automated email flow, or lifecycle email program. Also use when the user mentions "email sequence," "drip campaign," "nurture sequence," "onboarding emails," "welcome sequence," "re-engagement emails," "email automation," "lifecycle emails," "trigger-based emails," "email funnel," "email workflow," "what emails should I send," "welcome series," or "email cadence." Use this for any multi-email automated flow. For cold out

Computed 9223,781

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

free-tool-strategy

When the user wants to build a free tool for marketing — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Use when they mention 'engineering as marketing,' 'free tool,' 'calculator,' 'generator,' 'checker,' 'grader,' 'marketing tool,' 'lead gen tool,' 'build something for traffic,' 'interactive tool,' or 'free resource.' Covers idea evaluation, tool design, and launch strategy. For pure SEO content strategy (no tool), use seo-audit or content-strategy instead.

Computed 9228

MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli

free-tool-strategy

Plans free tools, calculators, generators, and interactive widgets that attract target audience through search and social sharing. Engineering as marketing — build something useful, capture leads. Use when someone wants to build a free tool for marketing, says 'free tool', 'calculator', 'generator', 'engineering as marketing', 'side project marketing', 'interactive widget', 'lead generation tool', 'SEO tool', 'growth hack', 'build something to attract users', or wants to attract users through ut