Best for
- Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence.
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/skills/suede-prospecting/SKILL.md
Suede-owned prospecting and qualification discipline. Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence. NOT FOR: sending outreach (use suede-cold-email), changing CRM routing (use suede-revops), or profiling competitors instead of prospects (use suede-competitor-profiling).
Decision brief
Suede Prospecting turns an approved ICP into a source-backed, scored lead sheet across B2B SaaS, general B2B, local business, and early demand-signal motions. Every candidate carries qualification evidence, disqualification logic, and a compliance-aware handoff before outreach b…
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill "skills/suede-prospecting"Inspect the Agent Skill "suede-prospecting" from https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/blob/e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7/skills/suede-prospecting/SKILL.md at commit e51c63572afeac61dc944a3ad21d725d0c4e56f7. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Pull from product-marketing.md if available. Otherwise, gather:
Start with a bounded candidate sample sized to the requested output, source access, and review capacity. Expand only when observed disqualification rates show that another batch is needed.
Score every candidate against the ICP checklist. Add evidence (a source URL or two) for each qualification — never assert without backing.
Apply this rubric for the SaaS, B2B, and Local SMB branches. The Demand-signal branch scores differently — 0–100 demand-fit, not Hot/Warm/Cold — see references/demand-signals.md.
(SaaS / B2B / Local SMB. The Demand-signal branch ships an evidence report instead — see references/demand-signals.md.)
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 97/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 165 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Suede Prospecting turns an approved ICP into a source-backed, scored lead sheet across B2B SaaS, general B2B, local business, and early demand-signal motions. Every candidate carries qualification evidence, disqualification logic, and a compliance-aware handoff before outreach begins.
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Prospecting motions differ enough that the workflow forks at intake. Pick one branch based on who the user is selling to:
| Branch | Sell to | What "qualified" looks like | Possible sources after access and terms checks |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS | Other SaaS companies / digital businesses | ICP fit + tech stack match + growth signals (funding, hiring, product velocity) | Public company sites, directories, developer sources, or licensed data available to the user |
| B2B | Non-SaaS B2B (services, manufacturers, enterprises, mid-market) | Industry + size + geographic fit + buying signals (trigger events, vendor changes) | Public company records, industry directories, or licensed business data available to the user |
| Local SMB | Local small businesses (shops, gyms, restaurants, clinics, salons, services) | Active business + website status + proximity + decision-maker access | Public business sites and manually reviewed listings allowed by their terms |
| Demand-signal | Early-stage: first customers, design partners, or beta users | A cited public pain, demand, or timing signal, not just firmographic fit | Public forums, reviews, issues, posts, jobs, and launch records reachable with current authorized tools or manual review |
Before using any named platform or vendor, discover what is currently callable, authenticated, authorized, and permitted by its terms. If no research connector or browser is available, give the user a manual source checklist and work from URLs, exports, screenshots, or source text they provide.
If the user describes a hybrid motion (e.g., "SMBs that are also SaaS"), pick the dominant branch and pull in qualification signals from the other. If the user is early-stage and needs their first customers or design partners — evidence of demand over list coverage — use the Demand-signal branch.
For the branch-specific deep dives:
Every prospecting engagement follows the same five phases. Tools and qualification signals change per branch; the phases don't.
Pull from product-marketing.md if available. Otherwise, gather:
Output the ICP as a one-paragraph statement plus a checklist of pass/fail criteria. Don't move to discovery without this.
Start with a bounded candidate sample sized to the requested output, source access, and review capacity. Expand only when observed disqualification rates show that another batch is needed.
A smaller evidence-complete list is preferable to padding the output with unverified candidates.
Score every candidate against the ICP checklist. Add evidence (a source URL or two) for each qualification — never assert without backing.
Confidence levels (used across all branches):
For email contacts, discover whether an authorized validator is callable and
read its current result semantics before use. If none is available, label the
address unverified, keep it out of send-ready exports, and provide a
user-operated validation checklist. Never claim that validation guarantees
delivery.
Apply this rubric for the SaaS, B2B, and Local SMB branches. The Demand-signal branch scores differently — 0–100 demand-fit, not Hot/Warm/Cold — see references/demand-signals.md.
| Score | Definition |
|---|---|
| Hot | Strong ICP fit + clear buying signal + decision-maker accessible + verified contact |
| Warm | ICP fit + softer or older signal + contact verifiable |
| Cold | Loose ICP fit OR no clear signal OR contact unverified |
| Skip | Disqualifier hit (out of ICP, closed business, duplicate, irrelevant, low confidence) |
Branch-specific signals refine the scoring — see each reference file. Let the evidence determine the number in each label; never force a Hot/Warm/Cold quota.
(SaaS / B2B / Local SMB. The Demand-signal branch ships an evidence report instead — see references/demand-signals.md.)
Default to a markdown table in chat. Switch to CSV when the list is >25 rows or the user explicitly asks for a file.
After the table, add "Priority review candidates" when the evidence supports one or more: a bounded set ranked by current signal strength, with one sentence on what was verified and what still needs review.
Columns vary by branch (see reference files), but every lead sheet includes:
These apply to every branch. Read first, every engagement.
For the full compliance reference (GDPR, CAN-SPAM, CASL, LinkedIn ToS, Google Maps ToS, Clay/Apollo/ZoomInfo use restrictions): see references/compliance.md.
If missing, ask once, then infer reasonable defaults and continue:
product-marketing.md if presentFull breakdown in references/data-sources.md. Quick picks:
Treat every named product below as a candidate, not an available capability. Discover currently callable tools and verify the user's authenticated access, license, source terms, and cost first.
| If the user has access to... | Use it for |
|---|---|
| Apollo | B2B / SaaS firmographic + contact discovery |
| Clay | Multi-source enrichment, waterfall lookups, custom scoring |
| Clearbit | Email-to-company and company enrichment |
| ZoomInfo | Enterprise B2B contact + intent data |
| Hunter or Snov | Email pattern guessing and verification |
| Truelist | Email deliverability validation (before adding to outreach list) |
| LinkedIn Sales Navigator | Decision-maker mapping (manual, no scraping) |
| BuiltWith / Wappalyzer | Tech stack qualification (SaaS branch) |
| Crunchbase | Funding signals (SaaS branch) |
| GitHub | Stargazers / forks of competitor or adjacent repos (dev-tool SaaS branch) |
| Google Maps + browser | Local SMB discovery |
| Firecrawl / Browserbase | Programmatic extraction from individual prospect websites — never from platforms |
If the user has no enrichment or browser tools: provide exact public-source queries and a qualification worksheet, then work from URLs, exports, or screenshots the user supplies.
For SaaS / B2B (≤25 rows):
| Score | Company | Industry | Size | Signal | Contact | Email status | Source | Confidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
For Local SMB (≤15 rows) — port from the local-prospector reference:
| Score | Business | Category | Area | Website status | Website/Social | Phone | Why it's a prospect | Confidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
SaaS / B2B columns:
score,company,domain,industry,size_band,country,signal,contact_name,contact_title,contact_email,email_status,linkedin,source_urls,why_prospect,confidence,verified_date,notes
Local SMB columns:
score,business,category,area,distance_km,website_status,website_url,social_urls,phone,email,source_urls,why_prospect,confidence,verified_date,notes
unverified; failed results stay in a
separate invalid bucketunverified with a manual validation
handoff.suede-cold-email).These are selection examples, not guaranteed integrations. Before using one, verify current vendor documentation, account access, pricing, data freshness, export rights, platform terms, and whether a callable connector is actually available in the current session.
| Tool | Best For | Verify Before Use |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo | B2B / SaaS firmographic + contact discovery | Freshness, export terms, email validation |
| Clay | Multi-source enrichment + waterfall | Credit cost, providers, field provenance |
| Clearbit | Email-to-company enrichment | Current product access and coverage |
| ZoomInfo | Enterprise B2B contact + intent | License, export rights, signal freshness |
| Hunter / Snov | Email pattern discovery | Verification status and lawful basis |
| Truelist | Email deliverability validation | Result meanings and current API limits |
| Outreach | Sales engagement after approval | Sequence permissions and suppression rules |
| RB2B | Visitor identification | Privacy basis and company-vs-person grain |
| GitHub | Public developer-intent signals | API terms, rate limits, company mapping |
| Firecrawl / Browserbase | Single-target public-site research | Target terms, scope, and session access |
suede-product-marketing to define the ICP and positioning context.suede-cold-email after a qualified list is approved for outreach copy.suede-revops for approved CRM routing and lifecycle handoff.suede-sales-enablement for collateral used in active sales work.Alternatives
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to find, qualify, and build a list of prospects to reach out to — across B2B SaaS, general B2B, or local small businesses. Also use when the user mentions "prospecting," "build a prospect list," "find prospects," "find leads," "lead gen list," "find SaaS companies that," "find B2B companies," "find local businesses," "ICP-fit accounts," "who should we go after," "outbound list," "target account list," "find clients near me," "businesses without websites," "prospect research,"
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to create or optimize an email sequence, drip campaign, automated email flow, or lifecycle email program. Also use when the user mentions "email sequence," "drip campaign," "nurture sequence," "onboarding emails," "welcome sequence," "re-engagement emails," "email automation," "lifecycle emails," "trigger-based emails," "email funnel," "email workflow," "what emails should I send," "welcome series," or "email cadence." Use this for any multi-email automated flow. For cold out
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
When the user wants to build a free tool for marketing — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Use when they mention 'engineering as marketing,' 'free tool,' 'calculator,' 'generator,' 'checker,' 'grader,' 'marketing tool,' 'lead gen tool,' 'build something for traffic,' 'interactive tool,' or 'free resource.' Covers idea evaluation, tool design, and launch strategy. For pure SEO content strategy (no tool), use seo-audit or content-strategy instead.
MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli
Plans free tools, calculators, generators, and interactive widgets that attract target audience through search and social sharing. Engineering as marketing — build something useful, capture leads. Use when someone wants to build a free tool for marketing, says 'free tool', 'calculator', 'generator', 'engineering as marketing', 'side project marketing', 'interactive widget', 'lead generation tool', 'SEO tool', 'growth hack', 'build something to attract users', or wants to attract users through ut