dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills

swiftui-performance

Profile, diagnose, and remediate SwiftUI runtime performance using code review, Instruments, and repeatable measurements. Use when a SwiftUI screen renders slowly, scrolling or animations hitch, view bodies update excessively, list identity churns, layout work spikes, or broad Observation dependencies raise CPU cost. Covers evidence-based triage, SwiftUI Instruments lanes, lazy-container guardrails, state lifetime, and before/after verification.

84Collecting
See how to use itView GitHub source
npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill "skills/swiftui-performance"
Automated source guide

Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026

Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md

Turn swiftui-performance's source instructions into a guide you can follow

According to the pinned SKILL.md from dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills: Audit SwiftUI view performance from a reproducible symptom to measured remediation. Route animation design to swiftui-animation, production telemetry to metrickit, ownership/leak analysis to ios-memgraph-analysis, navigation behavior to swiftui-navigation, state architecture to…

npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill "skills/swiftui-performance"
Check the pinned source

Best fit

  • Use when a SwiftUI screen renders slowly, scrolling or animations hitch, view bodies update excessively, list identity churns, layout work spikes, or broad Observation dependencies raise CPU cost.
  • Profile, diagnose, and remediate SwiftUI runtime performance using code review, Instruments, and repeatable measurements. Use when a SwiftUI screen renders slowly, scrolling or animations hitch, view bodies update excessively, list identity churns, layout work spikes, or broad Observation dependencies raise CPU cost. Covers evidence-based triage, SwiftUI Instruments lanes, lazy-container guardrails, state lifetime, and before/after verification.

Bring this context

  • A concrete task that matches the documented purpose of swiftui-performance.
  • The files, examples, or context the task depends on.
  • Your constraints, target environment, and definition of done.

Expected outputs

  • A short metrics table (before/after if available).
  • Top issues (ordered by impact).
  • Proposed fixes with estimated effort.

Key source sections

Read swiftui-performance through these 5 source sections

Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.

01

Workflow Decision Tree

Use this triage list for both code and trace analysis:

SKILL.md · Workflow Decision Tree
Code supplied: review it first and label findings as hypotheses.Symptoms only: collect the smallest relevant view, data flow, reproduction,Inconclusive review: collect a trace or lane screenshots before prescribing a
02

1. Code-First Review

Map each suspect from the triage list to exact code. Report likely causes with code references, but label them code-backed hypotheses until a trace confirms cost. Propose a minimal repro or measurement when evidence is missing.

SKILL.md · 1. Code-First Review
Map each suspect from the triage list to exact code. Report likely causes with code references, but label them code-backed hypotheses until a trace confirms cost. Propose a minimal repro or measurement when evidence is…
03

Review Checklist

[ ] No DateFormatter/NumberFormatter allocations inside body

SKILL.md · Review Checklist
[ ] No DateFormatter/NumberFormatter allocations inside body[ ] Large lists use Identifiable items or explicit id:[ ] @Observable models expose only the properties views actually read
04

2. Guide the User to Profile

Use the SwiftUI Instruments template on a Release build and real device when possible. Reproduce the exact interaction, capturing SwiftUI lanes, Time Profiler, and Hangs/Hitches as relevant. Ask for the trace or screenshots of the lanes and call tree.

SKILL.md · 2. Guide the User to Profile
Use the SwiftUI Instruments template on a Release build and real device when possible. Reproduce the exact interaction, capturing SwiftUI lanes, Time Profiler, and Hangs/Hitches as relevant. Ask for the trace or screens…
05

3. Analyze and Diagnose

Apply the same triage list to trace evidence. Correlate long or frequent SwiftUI updates with the Time Profiler call tree and the reproduced interaction. Separate trace-backed findings from code-backed hypotheses and name the next measurement that would resolve remaining uncerta…

SKILL.md · 3. Analyze and Diagnose
Apply the same triage list to trace evidence. Correlate long or frequent SwiftUI updates with the Time Profiler call tree and the reproduced interaction. Separate trace-backed findings from code-backed hypotheses and na…

SkillSignal prompt templates

Provide the task, context, and acceptance criteria

These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.

Task-start prompt

Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.

Use swiftui-performance to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.

Source-guided execution

Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.

Apply the pinned swiftui-performance source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “Workflow Decision Tree”, “1. Code-First Review”, “Review Checklist”, “2. Guide the User to Profile”, “3. Analyze and Diagnose”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].

Result-review prompt

Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.

Review the current swiftui-performance result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.

Output checklist

Verify each item before delivery

The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.

The source section “Workflow Decision Tree” has been checked.

The source section “1. Code-First Review” has been checked.

The source section “Review Checklist” has been checked.

The source section “2. Guide the User to Profile” has been checked.

Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.

Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.

Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.

Choose a different workflow

When another Skill is the better fit

FAQ

What does swiftui-performance do?

Audit SwiftUI view performance from a reproducible symptom to measured remediation. Route animation design to swiftui-animation, production telemetry to metrickit, ownership/leak analysis to ios-memgraph-analysis, navigation behavior to swiftui-navigation, state architecture to…

How do I start using swiftui-performance?

The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills --skill "skills/swiftui-performance". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which Agent platforms does it declare?

No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.

Repository stars
933
Repository forks
48
Quality
84/100
Source repository last pushed

Quality breakdown

Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.

84/100
Documentation30/30
Specificity21/25
Maintenance18/20
Trust signals15/25

Compare before choosing

Related Agent Skills and source variants

These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.

code-reviewer by jeffallan

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quali

dmux-workflows by affaan-m

Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.

dmux-workflows by affaan-m

Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.

postmortem-writing by wshobson

Write effective blameless postmortems with root cause analysis, timelines, and action items. Use when conducting incident reviews, writing postmortem documents, or improving incident response processes.

bug-fixing-openclaw by yun520-1

Zero-regression bug fix workflow: triage → reproduce → root cause → impact analysis → fix → verify → knowledge deposit → self-reflect. Use when: - Feature broken, incorrect behavior, wrong output, errors/exceptions - Console errors/warnings even when feature appears functional - Regressions, timeouts, degraded performance - Keywords: "fix bug", "debug", "not working", "error", "broken" Output: Bug summary + verification report + code review + self-reflection score. Not for: new features (use ful

View original Skill.mdThis page is parsed directly from the repository SKILL.md without editorial rewriting. Collected: Jul 28, 2026 · about 7 min

SwiftUI Performance

Audit SwiftUI view performance from a reproducible symptom to measured remediation. Route animation design to swiftui-animation, production telemetry to metrickit, ownership/leak analysis to ios-memgraph-analysis, navigation behavior to swiftui-navigation, state architecture to swiftui-patterns, and layout construction to swiftui-layout-components.

Contents

Workflow Decision Tree

  • Code supplied: review it first and label findings as hypotheses.
  • Symptoms only: collect the smallest relevant view, data flow, reproduction, device, OS, and build configuration.
  • Inconclusive review: collect a trace or lane screenshots before prescribing a broad refactor.

Use this triage list for both code and trace analysis:

  • Broad state dependencies or invalidation storms
  • Unstable list identity or root conditional swapping
  • Formatting, sorting, decoding, or synchronous I/O in body
  • Layout/geometry feedback loops and oversized images
  • Implicit animation applied to a large hierarchy

1. Code-First Review

Map each suspect from the triage list to exact code. Report likely causes with code references, but label them code-backed hypotheses until a trace confirms cost. Propose a minimal repro or measurement when evidence is missing.

2. Guide the User to Profile

Use the SwiftUI Instruments template on a Release build and real device when possible. Reproduce the exact interaction, capturing SwiftUI lanes, Time Profiler, and Hangs/Hitches as relevant. Ask for the trace or screenshots of the lanes and call tree.

3. Analyze and Diagnose

Apply the same triage list to trace evidence. Correlate long or frequent SwiftUI updates with the Time Profiler call tree and the reproduced interaction. Separate trace-backed findings from code-backed hypotheses and name the next measurement that would resolve remaining uncertainty.

4. Remediate

Apply targeted fixes:

  • Narrow state scope (@State/@Observable closer to leaf views).
  • Stabilize identities for ForEach and lists.
  • Move heavy work out of body into model-layer precomputation, an explicit derived value updated when its inputs change, a memoized helper, or background processing. Use @State only when the view owns both the value and its update lifecycle; it is not a generic cache for arbitrary computation.
  • Use equatable() only when equality is cheaper than recomputing the subtree and the compared inputs have stable value semantics.
  • Downsample images before rendering.
  • Reduce layout complexity or use fixed sizing where possible.

Common Code Smells (and Fixes)

SmellEvidence to seekTargeted fix
Formatter, sort, filter, or decode in bodyLong/frequent body updates with matching call-tree costRecompute when inputs change; downsample/decode off the main actor
UUID() or unstable id: \.selfRecreated rows, lost state, excess updatesUse stable model identity
Root if/else swapsState reset or update spikes when toggledLocalize conditional content/modifiers when semantics allow
Broad model readsMany unrelated views update togetherPass narrow values or move reads into focused child views
Geometry writes during layoutRepeating layout/update cycleThreshold changes or replace the feedback path with stable layout

5. Verify

Ask the user to re-run the same capture and compare with baseline metrics. Summarize the delta (CPU, frame drops, memory peak) if provided.

Outputs

Provide:

  • A short metrics table (before/after if available).
  • Top issues (ordered by impact).
  • Proposed fixes with estimated effort.

Instruments Profiling

Use the SwiftUI template in Instruments (Cmd+I to profile). Current SwiftUI lanes include Update Groups, Long View Body Updates, Long Representable Updates / Representable Updates, Other Long Updates / Other Updates, and the Cause & Effect Graph. Correlate those with Time Profiler and Hangs/Hitches.

Add Self._printChanges() in debug builds to log which property triggered a view update:

var body: some View {
    #if DEBUG
    let _ = Self._printChanges()  // "MyView: @self, _count changed."
    #endif
    Text("Count: \(count)")
}

See references/optimizing-swiftui-performance-instruments.md for the full profiling workflow.

Identity and Lifetime

Identity controls view lifetime and state. Use stable model IDs in repeated content and reserve .id(_:) changes for intentional resets. Prefer @ViewBuilder or generic composition over AnyView in profiled hot rows. Treat root conditional branches as suspects—not automatic defects—when evidence shows state churn or expensive recreation.

Text(title)
    .foregroundStyle(isHighlighted ? .yellow : .primary)

ForEach(items) { item in
    Row(item: item).id(item.stableID)
}

Lazy Loading Patterns

Use lazy containers when profiling shows eager construction, layout, or update work is material; there is no universal item-count threshold. Route grid/list construction choices to swiftui-layout-components.

Guardrails:

  • Off-screen views are removed from the lazy stack. SwiftUI may keep them briefly, then delete the views and their view-local state.
  • Persist important row state outside the row view if it must survive scrolling away.
  • Body and layout work can happen before onAppear because of prefetching. Do not make onAppear the only setup point for data a row needs to render.
  • Treat onAppear and onDisappear as visibility signals, not lifetime guarantees.
  • Filter data before ForEach; avoid if branches that make each element produce zero or one row.
  • Keep each ForEach element to a constant number of top-level subviews. Wrap row contents in a stable container if needed. Use -LogForEachSlowPath YES while debugging list/table slow paths.
  • Avoid absolute content-size or content-offset assumptions; lazy stacks estimate off-screen sizes.
  • Avoid geometry feedback loops in lazy rows. Prefer stable sizing, layout primitives, or a custom Layout before feeding geometry changes back into row state.

State and Observation Optimization

Observation tracks properties read during view evaluation. Reduce fan-out by passing narrow derived values or moving reads into focused child views.

// Split reads into child views so each tracks only what it renders.
struct ProfileView: View {
    let model: ProfileModel
    var body: some View {
        VStack {
            NameRow(model: model)      // only tracks name
            EmailRow(model: model)     // only tracks email
            AvatarView(model: model)   // only tracks avatar
            SettingsForm(model: model) // only tracks settings
        }
    }
}

Cheap computed values can remain derived; expensive transformations need an explicit owner, input set, and refresh trigger. Do not add view models as a performance ritual—measure first and route general state design to swiftui-patterns.

Common Mistakes

  1. Profiling Debug builds. Debug builds include extra runtime checks and disable optimizations, producing misleading perf data. Profile Release builds on a real device.
  2. Observing an entire model when only one property is needed. Break large @Observable models into focused ones, or use computed properties/closures to narrow observation scope.
  3. Using geometry feedback inside ScrollView items. GeometryReader or noisy geometry state can force repeated layout. Prefer stable sizing, custom layout, or narrowly scoped .onGeometryChange (iOS 16+) with thresholds.
  4. Calling DateFormatter() or NumberFormatter() inside body. These are expensive to create. Make them static or move them outside the view.
  5. Animating non-equatable state. If SwiftUI cannot determine equality, it redraws every frame. Conform state to Equatable, then use .animation(_:value:) for simple value-bound changes or .animation(_:body:) for narrower modifier-scoped implicit animation.
  6. Large flat List without identifiers. Use id: or make items Identifiable so SwiftUI can diff efficiently instead of rebuilding the entire list.
  7. Unnecessary @State wrapper objects. Wrapping a simple value type in a class for @State defeats value semantics. Use plain @State with structs.
  8. Blocking MainActor with synchronous I/O. File reads, JSON parsing of large payloads, and image decoding should happen off the main actor. Prefer nonisolated async helpers or dedicated actors; reserve Task.detached for cases where you intentionally break actor inheritance and handle cancellation yourself.

Review Checklist

  • No DateFormatter/NumberFormatter allocations inside body
  • Large lists use Identifiable items or explicit id:
  • @Observable models expose only the properties views actually read
  • Heavy computation is off MainActor (image processing, parsing)
  • Lazy rows have stable identity, constant top-level row shape, and prefiltered data
  • Geometry changes in scroll rows are thresholded and do not feed broad state
  • Row rendering does not depend on onAppear as the only setup point
  • Implicit animations use .animation(_:value:) for value-bound changes or .animation(_:body:) for narrower modifier scope
  • No synchronous network/file I/O on the main thread
  • Profiling done on Release build, real device
  • @State is not used as an unspecified cache; every derived value has an explicit owner and refresh trigger
  • equatable() is used only when comparison is cheaper than recomputation and inputs have stable value semantics
  • Findings distinguish code-backed hypotheses from trace-backed evidence
  • @Observable view models are @MainActor-isolated; types crossing concurrency boundaries are Sendable

References

Skill path
skills/swiftui-performance/SKILL.md
Commit SHA
90c957327253
Repository license
NOASSERTION
Data collected