Best fit
- user says "fix", "debug", "run this", "check the repo", or "push it"
- the task depends on command output, git state, test results, or a verified local fix
- the answer must distinguish changed locally, verified locally, committed, and pushed
affaan-m/ECC
Evidence-first repo execution workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed with exact proof of what was executed and verified.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/terminal-ops"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: Use this when the user wants real repo execution: run commands, inspect git state, debug CI or builds, make a narrow fix, and report exactly what changed and what was verified.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/terminal-ops"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
Before changing anything:
the response names the proving command or test
Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
user says "fix", "debug", "run this", "check the repo", or "push it"
inspect before editing
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use terminal-ops to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned terminal-ops source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “Workflow”, “Verification”, “Skill Stack”, “When to Use”, “Guardrails”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current terminal-ops result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “Workflow” has been checked.
The source section “Verification” has been checked.
The source section “Skill Stack” has been checked.
The source section “When to Use” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
ECCのための証拠優先のリポジトリ実行ワークフロー。ユーザーがコマンドの実行、リポジトリの確認、CIの失敗のデバッグ、正確な実行と検証の証明を伴う狭い修正のプッシュを必要とする場合に使用する。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detail基于证据优先的仓库执行工作流,适用于ECC。当用户需要运行命令、检查仓库、调试CI失败或推送带有精确执行和验证证明的窄修复时使用。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailUse when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
A separate implementation from event4u-app/agent-config; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
Use this when the user wants real repo execution: run commands, inspect git state, debug CI or builds, make a narrow fix, and report exactly what changed and what was verified.
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/terminal-ops". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
ECCのための証拠優先のリポジトリ実行ワークフロー。ユーザーがコマンドの実行、リポジトリの確認、CIの失敗のデバッグ、正確な実行と検証の証明を伴う狭い修正のプッシュを必要とする場合に使用する。
基于证据优先的仓库执行工作流,适用于ECC。当用户需要运行命令、检查仓库、调试CI失败或推送带有精确执行和验证证明的窄修复时使用。
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.
Use NeuroKit2 to build or audit reproducible research workflows for physiological time-series preprocessing, event/interval analysis, multimodal alignment, variability, and complexity. Trigger when code imports neurokit2 or needs its current APIs, schemas, and method-aware validation—not for diagnosis or device validation.
Use this when the user wants real repo execution: run commands, inspect git state, debug CI or builds, make a narrow fix, and report exactly what changed and what was verified.
This skill is intentionally narrower than general coding guidance. It is an operator workflow for evidence-first terminal execution.
Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
verification-loop for exact proving steps after changestdd-workflow when the right fix needs regression coveragesecurity-review when secrets, auth, or external inputs are involvedgithub-ops when the task depends on CI runs, PR state, or release statusknowledge-ops when the verified outcome needs to be captured into durable project contextSettle:
Before changing anything:
Solve one dominant failure at a time:
Use exact status words:
SURFACE
- repo
- branch
- requested mode
EVIDENCE
- failing command / diff / test
ACTION
- what changed
STATUS
- inspected / changed locally / verified locally / committed / pushed / blocked