Source profileQuality 86/100

Jeffallan/claude-skills/skills/test-master/SKILL.md

test-master

Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation frameworks; analyzing coverage gaps; performance testing with k6 or Artillery; security testing with OWASP methods; debugging flaky tests; or working on QA, regression, test automation, qu

Source repository stars
10,762
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-05-20
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Comprehensive testing specialist ensuring software quality through functional, performance, and security testing.

Best for

  • Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation frameworks; analyzing coverage gaps; performance testing with k6 or Artillery; security testing with OWASP methods; de…

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill "skills/test-master"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "test-master" from https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills/blob/e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319/skills/test-master/SKILL.md at commit e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Core Workflow

    1. Define scope — Identify what to test and which testing types apply 2. Create strategy — Plan the test approach across functional, performance, and security perspectives 3. Write tests — Implement tests with proper assertions (see example below) 4. Execute — Run tests and coll…

    Define scope — Identify what to test and which testing types applyCreate strategy — Plan the test approach across functional, performance, and security perspectivesWrite tests — Implement tests with proper assertions (see example below)
  2. 02

    Quick-Start Example

    A minimal Jest unit test illustrating the key patterns this skill enforces:

    A minimal Jest unit test illustrating the key patterns this skill enforces:Apply the same structure for pytest (def test…, assert result == expected) and other frameworks.
  3. 03

    Reference Guide

    Load detailed guidance based on context:

    Load detailed guidance based on context:
  4. 04

    Constraints

    MUST DO - Test happy paths AND error/edge cases (e.g., empty input, null, boundary values) - Mock external dependencies — never call real APIs or databases in unit tests - Use meaningful it('…') descriptions that read as plain-English specifications - Assert specific outcomes (e…

    Test happy paths AND error/edge cases (e.g., empty input, null, boundary values)Mock external dependencies — never call real APIs or databases in unit testsUse meaningful it('…') descriptions that read as plain-English specifications

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score86/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars10,762SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
Jeffallan/claude-skills
Skill path
skills/test-master/SKILL.md
Commit
e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Test Master

Comprehensive testing specialist ensuring software quality through functional, performance, and security testing.

Core Workflow

  1. Define scope — Identify what to test and which testing types apply
  2. Create strategy — Plan the test approach across functional, performance, and security perspectives
  3. Write tests — Implement tests with proper assertions (see example below)
  4. Execute — Run tests and collect results
    • If tests fail: classify the failure (assertion error vs. environment/flakiness), fix root cause, re-run
    • If tests are flaky: isolate ordering dependencies, check async handling, add retry or stabilization logic
  5. Report — Document findings with severity ratings and actionable fix recommendations
    • Verify coverage targets are met before closing; flag gaps explicitly

Quick-Start Example

A minimal Jest unit test illustrating the key patterns this skill enforces:

// ✅ Good: meaningful description, specific assertion, isolated dependency
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
  it('applies 10% discount for premium users', () => {
    const result = calculateDiscount({ price: 100, userTier: 'premium' });
    expect(result).toBe(90); // specific outcome, not just truthy
  });

  it('throws on negative price', () => {
    expect(() => calculateDiscount({ price: -1, userTier: 'standard' }))
      .toThrow('Price must be non-negative');
  });
});

Apply the same structure for pytest (def test_…, assert result == expected) and other frameworks.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Unit Testingreferences/unit-testing.mdJest, Vitest, pytest patterns
Integrationreferences/integration-testing.mdAPI testing, Supertest
E2Ereferences/e2e-testing.mdE2E strategy, user flows
Performancereferences/performance-testing.mdk6, load testing
Securityreferences/security-testing.mdSecurity test checklist
Reportsreferences/test-reports.mdReport templates, findings
QA Methodologyreferences/qa-methodology.mdManual testing, quality advocacy, shift-left, continuous testing
Automationreferences/automation-frameworks.mdFramework patterns, scaling, maintenance, team enablement
TDD Iron Lawsreferences/tdd-iron-laws.mdTDD methodology, test-first development, red-green-refactor
Testing Anti-Patternsreferences/testing-anti-patterns.mdTest review, mock issues, test quality problems

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Test happy paths AND error/edge cases (e.g., empty input, null, boundary values)
  • Mock external dependencies — never call real APIs or databases in unit tests
  • Use meaningful it('…') descriptions that read as plain-English specifications
  • Assert specific outcomes (expect(result).toBe(90)), not just truthiness
  • Run tests in CI/CD; document and remediate coverage gaps

MUST NOT

  • Skip error-path testing (e.g., don't test only the success branch of a try/catch)
  • Use production data in tests — use fixtures or factories instead
  • Create order-dependent tests — each test must be independently runnable
  • Ignore flaky tests — quarantine and fix them; don't just re-run until green
  • Test implementation details (internal method calls) — test observable behaviour

Output Templates

When creating test plans, provide:

  1. Test scope and approach
  2. Test cases with expected outcomes
  3. Coverage analysis
  4. Findings with severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
  5. Specific fix recommendations

Documentation

Alternatives

Compare before choosing