datadog-labs/agent-skills/dd-apm/k8s-ssi/troubleshoot-ssi/SKILL.md
troubleshoot-ssi
Diagnose and fix Single Step Instrumentation (SSI) issues on Kubernetes — SSI automatically instruments applications for APM without code changes. Only use if the agent and SSI are already configured but traces are missing or instrumentation is not working.
- Source repository stars
- 158
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 3
- Last source update
- 2026-08-21
- Source checked
- 2026-08-25
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
Diagnose and fix Single Step Instrumentation (SSI) issues on Kubernetes — SSI automatically instruments applications for APM without code changes. Only use if the agent and SSI are already configured but traces are missing or instrumentation is not working.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill "dd-apm/k8s-ssi/troubleshoot-ssi"Inspect the Agent Skill "troubleshoot-ssi" from https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills/blob/47d0cf5096fed4e7191e1f8eb2b2dc69cc135f10/dd-apm/k8s-ssi/troubleshoot-ssi/SKILL.md at commit 47d0cf5096fed4e7191e1f8eb2b2dc69cc135f10. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Step 1: Triage
Run all seven simultaneously and surface them back to the user as the diagnostics you're running. Everything after this is driven by what you find here. Resolve from kubectl get pod -n -o jsonpath='{.spec.nodeName}' once you have a pod name; if no pod context yet, run the pup co…
Run all seven simultaneously and surface them back to the user as the diagnostics you're running. Everything after this is driven by what you find here. Resolve from kubectl get pod -n -o jsonpath='{.spec.nodeName}' onc…The last command confirms the Admission Controller webhook is registered cluster-wide — this is the precondition for SSI injection working at all and must be checked even when most other services are being instrumented…pup apm troubleshooting list surfaces injection errors that Datadog's backend received from the cluster — these point to cluster-side mutation failures that may not be visible from kubectl describe alone. pup apm servic… - 02
Step 2: State Your Hypotheses
Before investigating, explicitly state your ranked hypotheses based on triage output. Do not skip this step.
Before investigating, explicitly state your ranked hypotheses based on triage output. Do not skip this step.When the user reports multiple affected services in the same namespace, diagnose each independently. Two pods can fail injection for entirely different reasons (one opt-out annotation, one missing namespace label, one w…State your top 1-3 hypotheses explicitly: "Based on triage, I think the most likely cause is X because Y." - 03
Step 3: Investigate
Use only the tools relevant to your hypotheses. Each observation informs your next action.
Use only the tools relevant to your hypotheses. Each observation informs your next action.Is the pod in the Agent namespace? SSI never instruments pods in the same namespace as the Datadog Agent.Were pods restarted after SSI was enabled? - 04
Step 4: Reflect Before Concluding
Before applying any fix, answer: 1. What evidence confirms my hypothesis? 2. What evidence would contradict it — and have I checked? 3. Is there a simpler explanation I haven't considered?
What evidence confirms my hypothesis?What evidence would contradict it — and have I checked?Is there a simpler explanation I haven't considered? - 05
Step 5: Fix
Apply the fix for the confirmed root cause. If the fix requires a code or Dockerfile change, rebuild and reload:
kind (local): load the image into the clusterRegistry-based: skip — image will be pulled on next deploymentApply the fix for the confirmed root cause. If the fix requires a code or Dockerfile change, rebuild and reload:
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Network access
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
PUP_VERSION=$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/datadog-labs/pup/releases/latest | grep '"tag_name"' | cut -d'"' -f4)Network access
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
curl -L "https://github.com/datadog-labs/pup/releases/download/${PUP_VERSION}/pup_linux_amd64.tar.gz" | tar xz -C /usr/local/bin pupRuns scripts
The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
Run them if `pup` is available; recommend them for the user to run if it isn't. Do **not** substitute `pup traces search` for these — it is a different check and does not satisfy the runbook. If you don't know `<ENV>`, state your assumed vaRuns scripts
The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
docker build -f <DOCKERFILE_PATH> -t <IMAGE_NAME> <BUILD_CONTEXT>Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
Never write a raw API key into any file or chat messageEvidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 158 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- datadog-labs/agent-skills
- Skill path
- dd-apm/k8s-ssi/troubleshoot-ssi/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 47d0cf5096fed4e7191e1f8eb2b2dc69cc135f10
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-25
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Troubleshoot APM SSI on Kubernetes
Triggers
Invoke this skill when the user expresses intent to:
- Debug why a pod is not being instrumented
- Investigate why traces are not appearing in Datadog
- Diagnose admission webhook or init container injection failures
- Follow up on failed checks from
verify-ssi - Report that a specific service or pod has no traces
Do NOT invoke this skill if:
- SSI has not been enabled yet — run
enable-ssifirst
Prerequisites
- kubectl configured to target cluster —
kubectl config current-context
pup-cli: check, install, and authenticate
Claude runs
pup --version
If not found, install it (OS-aware):
Claude runs
if [[ "$(uname)" == "Darwin" ]]; then
brew tap datadog-labs/pack && brew install pup
else
PUP_VERSION=$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/datadog-labs/pup/releases/latest | grep '"tag_name"' | cut -d'"' -f4)
curl -L "https://github.com/datadog-labs/pup/releases/download/${PUP_VERSION}/pup_linux_amd64.tar.gz" | tar xz -C /usr/local/bin pup
chmod +x /usr/local/bin/pup
fi
pup --version
Check auth:
pup auth status
If not authenticated:
Claude runs
pup auth login
This opens a browser tab for OAuth. Complete the login there — Claude will continue once the command exits.
If no browser available: export DD_APP_KEY=<your-app-key>.
Context to resolve before acting
| Variable | How to resolve |
|---|---|
AGENT_NAMESPACE | Namespace where Datadog Agent is installed |
APP_NAMESPACE | Namespace of the application with missing traces |
CLUSTER_NAME | kubectl config current-context or spec.global.clusterName in datadog-agent.yaml |
SERVICE_NAME | tags.datadoghq.com/service label on the Deployment, or ask the user |
ENV | tags.datadoghq.com/env label on the Deployment, or ask the user |
POD_NAME | kubectl get pods -n <APP_NAMESPACE> — use the specific pod the user mentioned |
DEPLOYMENT_NAME | Check metadata.name in the Deployment manifest, or ask the user |
APP_LABEL | Check spec.selector.matchLabels.app in the Deployment manifest |
How SSI Works — Domain Knowledge
Read this before investigating. It gives you the mental model to reason about novel failures, not just known ones.
Injection chain:
- Admission webhook (registered by Cluster Agent) intercepts pod creation
- Webhook mutates the pod spec — adds a
datadog-lib-<language>-initinit container - Init container downloads the tracer library onto a shared volume
LD_PRELOADenv var is set pointing to the library.sofile- Application process loads the library automatically on startup via
LD_PRELOAD
What each diagnostic layer can see:
- pup — sees what Datadog's backend received. Blind to cluster-side injection failures. If pup shows no tracer telemetry for the service, the tracer was either never injected (cluster-side — confirm with the kubectl init-container check) or injected but unable to report yet (connectivity, DD_SITE, API key, or telemetry lag). Don't assume the cluster; cross-check kubectl.
- kubectl — sees cluster state. Blind to whether data reached Datadog. If kubectl shows the init container but pup shows no traces, the problem is post-injection.
What healthy looks like:
pup fleet tracers listshows the service as active, with the expected languagekubectl get pod -o jsonpath='{.spec.initContainers[*].name}'includesdatadog-lib-<language>-init
Known silent failures — SSI produces no error when these occur:
- Existing ddtrace or OTel instrumentation — SSI detects it and silently disables itself
- Unsupported runtime version — silently skipped
admission.datadoghq.com/enabled: "false"annotation — webhook skips the pod entirely- Pod not restarted after SSI enabled — injection happens at startup; existing pods keep running uninstrumented
- Pod in Agent namespace — SSI never instruments its own namespace
Reasoning shortcuts:
- No init container → webhook didn't fire → check: namespace targeting, pod-selector, opt-out annotation, webhook registration, pod not restarted
- Init container present + no traces → check whether the service is in
pup fleet tracers list: absent → tracer not reporting (Agent connectivity, DD_SITE mismatch, API key, blocked egress; or the tracer never loaded — existing ddtrace/OTel, unsupported runtime); present → reporting telemetry but spans not arriving (no traffic, sampling, ingestion/retention filter)
Step 1: Triage
Run all seven simultaneously and surface them back to the user as the diagnostics you're running. Everything after this is driven by what you find here. Resolve <NODE_HOSTNAME> from kubectl get pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> -o jsonpath='{.spec.nodeName}' once you have a pod name; if no pod context yet, run the pup commands without --hostname first.
Claude runs
pup traces search --query "service:<SERVICE_NAME>" --from 1h --limit 5
pup fleet tracers list --filter "service:<SERVICE_NAME>"
pup apm troubleshooting list --hostname <NODE_HOSTNAME> --timeframe 1h
pup apm service-library-config get --service-name <SERVICE_NAME> --env <ENV>
kubectl get pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> \
-o jsonpath='{.spec.initContainers[*].name}'
kubectl describe pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> | grep -A 10 "Events:"
kubectl get mutatingwebhookconfigurations | grep datadog
The last command confirms the Admission Controller webhook is registered cluster-wide — this is the precondition for SSI injection working at all and must be checked even when most other services are being instrumented (any deviation in one webhook config can silently skip a subset of pods).
pup apm troubleshooting list surfaces injection errors that Datadog's backend received from the cluster — these point to cluster-side mutation failures that may not be visible from kubectl describe alone. pup apm service-library-config get shows the runtime SDK config the tracer is operating under; an empty result with ddTraceConfigs configured, or unexpected values, points to UST/config-propagation issues.
Presenting your findings (required)
Your final response is the deliverable — not your investigation transcript. It must include every diagnostic from this skill that you ran or that applies, each with its purpose and what you found. Three failure modes to avoid:
-
Running a check but not reporting it. If you ran
kubectl get mutatingwebhookconfigurations, the namespaceadmission.datadoghq.com/mutate-podslabel check, or any other command during investigation, state the command and its result in your response. A check you ran but didn't surface gives the reader nothing — and the namespace-label and webhook checks in particular must appear explicitly. -
Omitting the two required pup diagnostics. Every diagnosis must explicitly include these two commands, by name, for each affected service — they are mandatory triage output, not optional:
pup apm troubleshooting list --hostname <NODE_HOSTNAME>— surfaces injection errors Datadog received from the nodepup apm service-library-config get --service-name <SERVICE_NAME> --env <ENV>— shows the tracer's runtime SDK config
Run them if
pupis available; recommend them for the user to run if it isn't. Do not substitutepup traces searchfor these — it is a different check and does not satisfy the runbook. If you don't know<ENV>, state your assumed value and run the command anyway. -
Stopping at the first root cause. When multiple services are affected, investigate and report each one independently — they may have different causes — and give per-service remediation.
Step 2: State Your Hypotheses
Before investigating, explicitly state your ranked hypotheses based on triage output. Do not skip this step.
When the user reports multiple affected services in the same namespace, diagnose each independently. Two pods can fail injection for entirely different reasons (one opt-out annotation, one missing namespace label, one with pre-existing ddtrace). Do not assume a shared root cause — investigate each service's pod spec, annotations, and runtime separately and surface findings per-service.
| Triage signal | Strong hypothesis |
|---|---|
| Traces arriving + service in tracers list | Both signals are service-scoped, so on a partial rollout they can be positive while the specific pod the user named is uninstrumented. First confirm this pod is instrumented (init container present in the triage kubectl check, or the admission.datadoghq.com/status: injected annotation). If it is, it's likely a UI filter or time window — tell the user and stop |
| No traces + no init container on this pod | Injection never happened for this pod — investigate: namespace targeting, webhook, pod-selector, opt-out annotation, pod not restarted (partial rollout). The per-pod init-container check is authoritative: on a partial rollout the service can still appear in tracers list from other pods, so a service-scoped positive must not mask this pod being uninstrumented |
| No traces + service NOT in tracers list + init container present | Tracer injected but not reporting — tracers list is telemetry-derived, so a correctly injected pod is absent when it can't report or hasn't yet. Investigate: Agent connectivity, DD_SITE mismatch, API key, blocked egress, or telemetry lag. (A true injection failure shows up as an absent init container or as init-container errors — the CrashLoopBackOff row below — not here.) |
| No traces + service in tracers list + init container present | Tracer is reporting telemetry (so Agent connectivity, API key, and DD_SITE are working) but spans aren't arriving — investigate trace-specific causes: no traffic / the app isn't serving requests yet, sampling rules, an ingestion/retention filter, or the trace-agent receiver |
| Pod events show CrashLoopBackOff or init container errors | Init container failure — check existing ddtrace, runtime version |
| Traces arriving but wrong service/env | UST labels missing or misconfigured on the Deployment |
State your top 1-3 hypotheses explicitly: "Based on triage, I think the most likely cause is X because Y."
Step 3: Investigate
Use only the tools relevant to your hypotheses. Each observation informs your next action.
Cluster-side investigation tools
Is the pod in the Agent namespace? SSI never instruments pods in the same namespace as the Datadog Agent.
kubectl get pods -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE>
Were pods restarted after SSI was enabled?
Confirm with the user before restarting. Tell the user: "Pods must be restarted for SSI to inject into them. I'll restart
<DEPLOYMENT_NAME>in<APP_NAMESPACE>. Ready to proceed?" Wait for confirmation.
Claude runs
kubectl rollout restart deployment/<DEPLOYMENT_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE>
kubectl wait --for=condition=Ready pod -l app=<APP_LABEL> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> --timeout=120s
Claude runs
# Primary — authoritative and immediate: confirm the freshly-restarted pods carry the init container.
# Label-scoped, not by <POD_NAME>: a rolling restart replaces the old pod with new-suffixed ones.
kubectl get pod -l app=<APP_LABEL> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> \
-o jsonpath='{.items[0].spec.initContainers[*].name}'
# Secondary — eventual: the service reappears here once the restarted pod reports telemetry
# (subject to a propagation delay of a minute or more, and only if the pod serves traffic)
pup fleet tracers list --filter "service:<SERVICE_NAME>"
The kubectl init-container check is the authoritative post-restart signal — the pod is injected the moment that init container appears. tracers list is telemetry-derived and lags, so don't read an empty result immediately after a restart as "injection didn't happen."
Does the namespace carry the Admission Controller opt-in label?
When the Admission Controller runs with mutateUnlabelled: false, injection happens only in namespaces explicitly labeled admission.datadoghq.com/mutate-pods=true. A namespace missing this label silently has SSI skipped for every pod in it — a common cause when most cluster services are instrumented but one namespace's services aren't.
kubectl get namespace <APP_NAMESPACE> -o jsonpath='{.metadata.labels}'
kubectl get namespace <APP_NAMESPACE> --show-labels
Fix: label the namespace, then restart the affected deployments so the AC mutates them on pod recreate.
kubectl label namespace <APP_NAMESPACE> admission.datadoghq.com/mutate-pods=true
Is namespace targeting filtering the pod out?
kubectl get datadogagent datadog -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE> -o yaml | grep -A 15 instrumentation
Fix: update enabledNamespaces in datadog-agent.yaml.
Claude runs
kubectl apply -f datadog-agent.yaml
Is a podSelector target filtering the pod out?
If targets with podSelector is configured, only pods whose labels match the selector are instrumented. Check whether the app pod's labels match any target:
kubectl get datadogagent datadog -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE> -o yaml | grep -A 20 targets
kubectl get pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> --show-labels
Fix: add a matching label to the pod template, or broaden the podSelector, then apply and restart.
Is a pod annotation opting it out — or missing the AC's injection-success annotation? Two annotations to look for:
admission.datadoghq.com/enabled: "false"— explicit opt-out, AC skips the pod.admission.datadoghq.com/status: injected— set by the AC after successful mutation; its absence on a running pod is positive evidence the AC never mutated it.
kubectl get pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> -o jsonpath='{.metadata.annotations}'
kubectl get pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> -o yaml | grep -A 10 annotations
Fix: remove an opt-out annotation from the Deployment pod template, then apply and restart.
Are the expected DD_* environment variables present in the running pod?
SSI injects DD_SERVICE, DD_ENV, DD_VERSION, DD_TRACE_*, and LD_PRELOAD into the container env when it mutates a pod. Their absence confirms the mutation did not run; their presence with unexpected values points to UST label mismatches or ddTraceConfigs issues.
kubectl exec -n <APP_NAMESPACE> <POD_NAME> -- env | grep -E '^(DD_|LD_PRELOAD)'
kubectl describe pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> | grep -E 'DD_|LD_PRELOAD'
Claude runs
kubectl apply -f <your-app-deployment.yaml>
Confirm with the user before restarting. Tell the user: "I need to restart
<DEPLOYMENT_NAME>in<APP_NAMESPACE>for this change to take effect. Ready to proceed?" Wait for confirmation.
Claude runs
kubectl rollout restart deployment/<DEPLOYMENT_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE>
Does the app have existing custom instrumentation? SSI silently disables itself when it detects existing tracer code. Scan source files for:
- Python:
import ddtrace,ddtrace.patch_all() - Node.js:
require('dd-trace'),DD.init() - Java:
GlobalTracer.register(,dd-java-agent - .NET:
Tracer.Instance,DD.Trace - Ruby:
require 'ddtrace',Datadog.configure - PHP:
DDTrace\
Also check dependency manifests: requirements.txt, package.json, Gemfile, pom.xml.
Fix: remove the import/package, rebuild image, reload into cluster, restart pod.
Is the base image Alpine (musl libc)?
K8s SSI injects LD_PRELOAD as an environment variable into the pod — it does not rely on /etc/ld.so.preload, so musl/Alpine images are supported. This is not a blocker for Kubernetes SSI.
Is the runtime version supported?
kubectl exec -n <APP_NAMESPACE> <POD_NAME> -- python --version
kubectl exec -n <APP_NAMESPACE> <POD_NAME> -- node --version
kubectl exec -n <APP_NAMESPACE> <POD_NAME> -- java -version
Verify against SSI compatibility matrix.
Is the admission webhook registered?
kubectl get mutatingwebhookconfigurations | grep datadog
kubectl get pods -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE> -l app=datadog-cluster-agent
kubectl logs -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE> -l app=datadog-cluster-agent --tail=100
Did injection produce errors? Get the node hostname first, then query Datadog for injection errors:
kubectl get pod <POD_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> -o jsonpath='{.spec.nodeName}'
pup apm troubleshooting list --hostname <NODE_HOSTNAME> --timeframe 1h
Is the Agent sending data to Datadog?
kubectl exec -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE> \
$(kubectl get pod -n <AGENT_NAMESPACE> -l app=datadog-agent -o name | head -1) \
-- agent status | grep -A 5 "APM Agent"
Datadog-side investigation tools
Is the tracer reporting?
pup fleet tracers list --filter "service:<SERVICE_NAME>"
Does APM recognise the service?
pup apm services list --env <ENV>
What SDK configuration is the service running with?
Shows env vars the tracer is configured with (e.g. DD_TRACE_ENABLED, DD_SERVICE, DD_ENV, sampling rules). Empty output is expected if ddTraceConfigs was not set in enable-ssi; a populated output mismatching what was configured indicates the change didn't propagate.
pup apm service-library-config get --service-name <SERVICE_NAME> --env <ENV>
Are traces arriving?
pup traces search --query "service:<SERVICE_NAME>" --from 1h --limit 10
Which agent is the tracer connected to? Use if connectivity between tracer and Agent is suspected.
pup fleet agents list --filter "hostname:<NODE_HOSTNAME>"
pup fleet agents tracers <AGENT_KEY> --filter "service:<SERVICE_NAME>"
Step 4: Reflect Before Concluding
Before applying any fix, answer:
- What evidence confirms my hypothesis?
- What evidence would contradict it — and have I checked?
- Is there a simpler explanation I haven't considered?
If the conclusion doesn't hold up, return to Step 2 with new hypotheses. Keep iterating until you can defend the conclusion against all three questions.
Step 5: Fix
Apply the fix for the confirmed root cause. If the fix requires a code or Dockerfile change, rebuild and reload:
Claude runs
docker build -f <DOCKERFILE_PATH> -t <IMAGE_NAME> <BUILD_CONTEXT>
[DECISION: cluster type]
- kind (local): load the image into the cluster
Claude runs
kind load docker-image <IMAGE_NAME> --name <CLUSTER_NAME>
- Registry-based: skip — image will be pulled on next deployment
Confirm with the user before restarting. Tell the user: "I need to restart
<DEPLOYMENT_NAME>in<APP_NAMESPACE>to apply the fix. Ready to proceed?" Wait for confirmation.
Claude runs
kubectl rollout restart deployment/<DEPLOYMENT_NAME> -n <APP_NAMESPACE>
kubectl wait --for=condition=Ready pod -l app=<APP_LABEL> -n <APP_NAMESPACE> --timeout=120s
Step 6: Verify
Re-run triage to confirm the fix worked:
Claude runs
pup traces search --query "service:<SERVICE_NAME>" --from 1h --limit 5
pup fleet tracers list --filter "service:<SERVICE_NAME>"
If traces are arriving — resolved (the service may take a minute to reappear in pup fleet tracers list; an empty tracers list immediately after the restart is expected telemetry lag, not a failure). Automatically proceed to onboarding-summary now — do not ask the user for permission.
ERROR: No traces arriving — return to Step 2 with the new triage data and form updated hypotheses.
Security constraints
- Never write a raw API key into any file or chat message
- Never run
kubectl deletewithout user confirmation - Never modify
admissionControllersettings directly docker pushto a registry always requires user confirmation
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the troubleshoot-ssi source document cover?
Diagnose and fix Single Step Instrumentation (SSI) issues on Kubernetes — SSI automatically instruments applications for APM without code changes. Only use if the agent and SSI are already configured but traces are missing or instrumentation is not working.
How do I install troubleshoot-ssi?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/datadog-labs/agent-skills --skill "dd-apm/k8s-ssi/troubleshoot-ssi". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Which permission-related actions were detected?
Static rules flagged network, exec-script, write-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
garrytan/gbrain
bulk-ingestion
End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
dotnet/skills
migrate-vstest-to-mtp
Migrates .NET test projects from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP). Use when user asks to "migrate to MTP", "switch from VSTest", "enable Microsoft.Testing.Platform", "use MTP runner", set OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props, or mentions EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner. USE FOR: MTP behavioral differences vs VSTest (exit code 8, zero tests discovered, --ignore-exit-code, TESTINGPLATFORM_EXITCODE_IGNORE); centralizing