Source profileQuality 77/100

paperclipai/paperclip/packages/plugins/plugin-llm-wiki/skills/wiki-lint/SKILL.md

wiki-lint

Use when an LLM Wiki operation issue is a lint or health check. Audit for contradictions, orphans, weak provenance, broken links, missing concept pages, and index/log drift; return triage findings without auto-fixing.

Source repository stars
74,938
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Audit, do not edit. Return findings the maintainer (human or agent) can triage.

Best for

  • Use when an LLM Wiki operation issue is a lint or health check.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip --skill "packages/plugins/plugin-llm-wiki/skills/wiki-lint"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "wiki-lint" from https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/77979950381a99271e4690c581a7440b73807b11/packages/plugins/plugin-llm-wiki/skills/wiki-lint/SKILL.md at commit 77979950381a99271e4690c581a7440b73807b11. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Workflow

    1. Walk the target space's wiki/index.md and wiki tree with wikisearch and wikireadpage, always passing the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug. Build a mental map of: pages that exist, pages referenced from index.md, pages referenced from other pages, and raw sources. 2. Che…

    Walk the target space's wiki/index.md and wiki tree with wikisearch and wikireadpage, always passing the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug. Build a mental map of: pages that exist, pages referenced from index.md, p…Check for the seven recurring issues, in this order:Contradictions — two pages making incompatible claims about the same entity, decision, or status. Flag both pages, name the conflicting claims, and quote evidence.
  2. 02

    Verification

    Before closing the operation issue:

    [ ] Findings are grouped by severity with file paths, evidence, and suggested fix per item.[ ] No files under raw/ were modified. No files under wiki/ were modified except wiki/log.md.[ ] If the run found nothing, the issue is closed with "no findings" and the log entry still exists so future audits can see this run happened.
  3. 03

    Inputs

    An operation issue with operationType: "lint".

    An operation issue with operationType: "lint".The operation issue's target wikiId, spaceSlug, and space root. Lint only that space unless the issue explicitly says this is a multi-space sweep.- An operation issue with operationType: "lint". - The operation issue's target wikiId, spaceSlug, and space root. Lint only that space unless the issue explicitly says this is a multi-space sweep.
  4. 04

    Voice

    Lead with the count by severity.

    Lead with the count by severity.Each finding is one bullet. Resist commentary.When in doubt about severity, say so and surface it as medium with a "verify" note.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score77/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars74,938SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
paperclipai/paperclip
Skill path
packages/plugins/plugin-llm-wiki/skills/wiki-lint/SKILL.md
Commit
77979950381a99271e4690c581a7440b73807b11
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
master
View the original SKILL.md

Wiki Lint

Audit, do not edit. Return findings the maintainer (human or agent) can triage.

Inputs

  • An operation issue with operationType: "lint".
  • The operation issue's target wikiId, spaceSlug, and space root. Lint only that space unless the issue explicitly says this is a multi-space sweep.

Workflow

  1. Walk the target space's wiki/index.md and wiki tree with wiki_search and wiki_read_page, always passing the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug. Build a mental map of: pages that exist, pages referenced from index.md, pages referenced from other pages, and raw sources.
  2. Check for the seven recurring issues, in this order:
    1. Contradictions — two pages making incompatible claims about the same entity, decision, or status. Flag both pages, name the conflicting claims, and quote evidence.
    2. Stale claims — a page asserts X, but a newer source under raw/ has superseded it. Flag the older page; never overwrite.
    3. Orphan pages — a wiki/ page is not linked from index.md and not referenced from any other wiki page. Either it should be linked, removed, or merged.
    4. Concept gaps — a term appears on three or more pages but has no dedicated wiki/concepts/<slug>.md. Recommend creating one.
    5. Broken [[wiki-links]] — a link target file does not exist.
    6. Weak provenance — a non-trivial claim is uncited or cites only the wiki itself in a circle. The original source ref should be findable.
    7. Index / log drift — pages exist that are not in index.md, or index.md lists pages that no longer exist. Recent operations in wiki/log.md that did not produce a corresponding page change.
  3. Return a triage list, grouped by severity:
    • critical: contradictions, broken links to active pages, fabricated citations.
    • medium: stale claims, weak provenance, large concept gaps.
    • low: orphans, log drift, small index gaps. Each item has: file path, evidence (a 1–2 line quote), suggested fix, and the operation that should follow up (ingest, paperclip-distill, index-refresh, manual review).
  4. Do not write to wiki/. Lint is read-only by design — the maintainer or the routine that follows decides which findings to act on.
  5. Append a log entry describing the run:
    ## [YYYY-MM-DD] lint | <N findings, M critical>
    - operation issue: <issue identifier>
    - critical: <count>
    - medium: <count>
    - low: <count>
    

Voice

  • Lead with the count by severity.
  • Each finding is one bullet. Resist commentary.
  • When in doubt about severity, say so and surface it as medium with a "verify" note.

Verification

Before closing the operation issue:

  • Findings are grouped by severity with file paths, evidence, and suggested fix per item.
  • No files under raw/ were modified. No files under wiki/ were modified except wiki/log.md.
  • If the run found nothing, the issue is closed with "no findings" and the log entry still exists so future audits can see this run happened.

Tools

wiki_search, wiki_read_page, wiki_list_sources, wiki_read_source, wiki_write_page (only wiki/log.md). Always include the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing