Source profileQuality 90/100

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/skills/writing-specs/SKILL.md

writing-specs

Generate a complete, executable Research Spec from North Star + user input. Strategy-level skill that orchestrates questioning, outline, and spec writing.

Source repository stars
382
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-15
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

You are generating a Research Spec — a document that is simultaneously human-readable and machine-executable. Another CC session will later read this spec and execute it step by step.

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill "skills/writing-specs"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "writing-specs" from https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/blob/970c22052a924d4e051e0e1631a5f7f651b5e60a/skills/writing-specs/SKILL.md at commit 970c22052a924d4e051e0e1631a5f7f651b5e60a. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Step 1: Read Research Catalog

      Read skills/research-catalog/SKILL.md in its entirety. Internalize: - All available campaigns and their strategies - The dependency relationships between campaigns - Pre-conditions for each campaign

      All available campaigns and their strategiesThe dependency relationships between campaignsPre-conditions for each campaign
    2. 02

      Step 2: Structured Questioning

      Invoke these 3 SOPs sequentially. Each asks 2-3 focused questions:

      scope-clarification — research boundaries, depth vs breadthcampaign-selection — which campaigns to include/emphasize/skipconstraint-elicitation — time budget, existing knowledge, hard constraints
    3. 03

      Step 3: Pipeline Outline

      Synthesize the North Star, ResearchBrief, and user answers into a 5-10 line outline:

      Synthesize the North Star, ResearchBrief, and user answers into a 5-10 line outline:Present this outline to the user. Wait for confirmation. User may adjust stages, reorder, add, or remove.
    4. 04

      Step 4: Write Full Spec

      Expand the confirmed outline into a complete Research Spec. Follow this schema exactly:

      Expand the confirmed outline into a complete Research Spec. Follow this schema exactly:
    5. 05

      Per-Stage Structure

      For EACH stage, write ALL of these fields: - Objective: What this stage accomplishes - Expected Input: What context is available from prior stages - Focus Areas: Specific aspects to emphasize - Recommended Combination: campaign → strategy-A, strategy-B - Completion Criteria: Qua…

      Objective: What this stage accomplishesExpected Input: What context is available from prior stagesFocus Areas: Specific aspects to emphasize

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score90/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars382SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
    Skill path
    skills/writing-specs/SKILL.md
    Commit
    970c22052a924d4e051e0e1631a5f7f651b5e60a
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Collected
    2026-08-25
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Writing Specs

    You are generating a Research Spec — a document that is simultaneously human-readable and machine-executable. Another CC session will later read this spec and execute it step by step.

    Prerequisites

    Before invoking this skill, the following MUST exist:

    • A confirmed North Star statement
    • A structured ResearchBrief
    • Both preserved in a context-checkpoint file

    Flow

    Step 1: Read Research Catalog

    Read skills/research-catalog/SKILL.md in its entirety. Internalize:

    • All available campaigns and their strategies
    • The dependency relationships between campaigns
    • Pre-conditions for each campaign

    Step 2: Structured Questioning

    Invoke these 3 SOPs sequentially. Each asks 2-3 focused questions:

    1. scope-clarification — research boundaries, depth vs breadth
    2. campaign-selection — which campaigns to include/emphasize/skip
    3. constraint-elicitation — time budget, existing knowledge, hard constraints When the outline includes an experiment-execution stage, default to SUGGESTING ara-from-context as a closing stage (compile the results into an ARA); the user may decline. Without experiment-execution, still offer it if the user wants the research packaged. ara-from-context is the 10th optional package — never a forced tail.

    Step 3: Pipeline Outline

    Synthesize the North Star, ResearchBrief, and user answers into a 5-10 line outline:

    Stage 1: [campaign] ([strategies]) — [topic/focus]
    Stage 2: [campaign] ([strategies]) — [topic/focus]
    ...
    Stage N: experiment-execution (experiment-design) — [topic]
    Stage N+1: ara-from-context — compile the research into an ARA (OPTIONAL closing stage; include only if the user wants the results packaged for agent reproduction; user may remove)
    

    Present this outline to the user. Wait for confirmation. User may adjust stages, reorder, add, or remove.

    Step 4: Write Full Spec

    Expand the confirmed outline into a complete Research Spec. Follow this schema exactly:

    Spec Header

    # Research Spec: <Topic>
    
    > Generated: YYYY-MM-DD
    > North Star: <one sentence>
    > Scope: <N> stages, estimated <M> sessions
    > Source: de-anthropocentric-research-engine
    

    Global Sections

    • Global Context Protocol (context-init/checkpoint rules)
    • Global Execution Rules (±10% deviation, backtrack confirmation)
    • Global Backtrack Conditions

    Per-Stage Structure

    For EACH stage, write ALL of these fields:

    • Objective: What this stage accomplishes
    • Expected Input: What context is available from prior stages
    • Focus Areas: Specific aspects to emphasize
    • Recommended Combination: campaign → strategy-A, strategy-B
    • Completion Criteria: Quantified threshold (numeric or objectively verifiable)
    • Backtrack Condition: if [condition], → Stage N (requires user confirmation)
    • Execution Steps: Checkbox items (context-init, each strategy, checkpoints)

    Granularity Rules

    • Name specific strategies (not tactics/SOPs — those are CC's choice at execution time)
    • Describe what topic/aspect each strategy addresses
    • Specify what prior context is available and how to use it
    • Quantify ALL completion criteria (no vague "sufficient" or "adequate")
    • Focus Areas tell CC what to prioritize within the campaign's scope

    ARA Closing Stage (when present)

    When the outline includes an ara-from-context stage, write its Execution Steps so the stage opens with an explicit user-decision gate, NOT an automatic transition:

    • First step: after experiment-execution's evaluation reports PASS, present to the user: "实验评估通过,是否进入 ARA 成文?(compile results into an ARA)" — proceed only on approval.
    • Do NOT hard-code which EE evaluation skill produces that PASS; the executing agent reads the spec's experiment-execution stage and the research-catalog to choose it at run time.
    • The gate is an ordinary natural-language Execution Step (spec = trace). Do not invent a new spec field, and do not reuse the Backtrack Condition mechanism (that is for retreat, this is a forward go/no-go decision).
    • Remaining steps: invoke ara-from-context (context-review → compile-and-review), producing ara/ + ara/level2_report.json. Note the external prerequisite: npx @ara-commons/ara-skills must be installed (compiler + rigor-reviewer).

    Step 5: Spec Self-Review

    Invoke spec-self-review SOP. This is MANDATORY and cannot be skipped.

    Step 6: User Review

    Present the completed spec to the user for review. Wait for approval or change requests. If changes requested, revise and re-run self-review.

    Output

    Save the spec to: docs/de-anthropocentric/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-spec.md

    Inform the user: "Spec complete. To execute, invoke executing-specs with the path to this spec file."

    Available SOPs

    Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

    SOPWhen to use
    campaign-selectionStructured questioning SOP to determine which campaigns to include, emphasize, or skip. Used during spec generation.
    constraint-elicitationStructured questioning SOP to identify practical constraints that shape the research spec. Used during spec generation.
    research-catalogCapability menu for the research engine. Lists the 10 freely-composable research packages, what each does, when to reach for it, and a pointer to its full skill table. Read this after north-star crystallization to decide which packages to use — no fixed order. Also serves as the skill-index (capability map).
    scope-clarificationStructured questioning SOP to determine research boundaries, depth, and breadth. Used during spec generation.
    spec-self-reviewQuality gate for Research Specs. Checks for placeholders, consistency, scope, ambiguity, context protocol, and quantification. Mandatory before user review.

    Frequently asked questions

    What to verify before installation and use

    What does the writing-specs source document cover?

    You are generating a Research Spec — a document that is simultaneously human-readable and machine-executable. Another CC session will later read this spec and execute it step by step.

    How do I install writing-specs?

    The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill "skills/writing-specs". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 913,023

    whiteguo233/OpenBiliClaw

    writing-specs

    Use when authoring a spec or implementation plan, or planning multi-task work.

    Computed 10045,511

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    ab-testing

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

    Computed 10045,511

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    churn-prevention

    When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o

    Computed 10024,921

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    app-store-optimization

    App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist