yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/skills/writing-specs/SKILL.md
writing-specs
Generate a complete, executable Research Spec from North Star + user input. Strategy-level skill that orchestrates questioning, outline, and spec writing.
- Source repository stars
- 382
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-15
- Source checked
- 2026-08-25
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
You are generating a Research Spec — a document that is simultaneously human-readable and machine-executable. Another CC session will later read this spec and execute it step by step.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill "skills/writing-specs"Inspect the Agent Skill "writing-specs" from https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/blob/970c22052a924d4e051e0e1631a5f7f651b5e60a/skills/writing-specs/SKILL.md at commit 970c22052a924d4e051e0e1631a5f7f651b5e60a. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Step 1: Read Research Catalog
Read skills/research-catalog/SKILL.md in its entirety. Internalize: - All available campaigns and their strategies - The dependency relationships between campaigns - Pre-conditions for each campaign
All available campaigns and their strategiesThe dependency relationships between campaignsPre-conditions for each campaign - 02
Step 2: Structured Questioning
Invoke these 3 SOPs sequentially. Each asks 2-3 focused questions:
scope-clarification — research boundaries, depth vs breadthcampaign-selection — which campaigns to include/emphasize/skipconstraint-elicitation — time budget, existing knowledge, hard constraints - 03
Step 3: Pipeline Outline
Synthesize the North Star, ResearchBrief, and user answers into a 5-10 line outline:
Synthesize the North Star, ResearchBrief, and user answers into a 5-10 line outline:Present this outline to the user. Wait for confirmation. User may adjust stages, reorder, add, or remove. - 04
Step 4: Write Full Spec
Expand the confirmed outline into a complete Research Spec. Follow this schema exactly:
Expand the confirmed outline into a complete Research Spec. Follow this schema exactly: - 05
Per-Stage Structure
For EACH stage, write ALL of these fields: - Objective: What this stage accomplishes - Expected Input: What context is available from prior stages - Focus Areas: Specific aspects to emphasize - Recommended Combination: campaign → strategy-A, strategy-B - Completion Criteria: Qua…
Objective: What this stage accomplishesExpected Input: What context is available from prior stagesFocus Areas: Specific aspects to emphasize
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 90/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 382 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine
- Skill path
- skills/writing-specs/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 970c22052a924d4e051e0e1631a5f7f651b5e60a
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Collected
- 2026-08-25
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Writing Specs
You are generating a Research Spec — a document that is simultaneously human-readable and machine-executable. Another CC session will later read this spec and execute it step by step.
Prerequisites
Before invoking this skill, the following MUST exist:
- A confirmed North Star statement
- A structured ResearchBrief
- Both preserved in a context-checkpoint file
Flow
Step 1: Read Research Catalog
Read skills/research-catalog/SKILL.md in its entirety. Internalize:
- All available campaigns and their strategies
- The dependency relationships between campaigns
- Pre-conditions for each campaign
Step 2: Structured Questioning
Invoke these 3 SOPs sequentially. Each asks 2-3 focused questions:
scope-clarification— research boundaries, depth vs breadthcampaign-selection— which campaigns to include/emphasize/skipconstraint-elicitation— time budget, existing knowledge, hard constraints When the outline includes an experiment-execution stage, default to SUGGESTINGara-from-contextas a closing stage (compile the results into an ARA); the user may decline. Without experiment-execution, still offer it if the user wants the research packaged. ara-from-context is the 10th optional package — never a forced tail.
Step 3: Pipeline Outline
Synthesize the North Star, ResearchBrief, and user answers into a 5-10 line outline:
Stage 1: [campaign] ([strategies]) — [topic/focus]
Stage 2: [campaign] ([strategies]) — [topic/focus]
...
Stage N: experiment-execution (experiment-design) — [topic]
Stage N+1: ara-from-context — compile the research into an ARA (OPTIONAL closing stage; include only if the user wants the results packaged for agent reproduction; user may remove)
Present this outline to the user. Wait for confirmation. User may adjust stages, reorder, add, or remove.
Step 4: Write Full Spec
Expand the confirmed outline into a complete Research Spec. Follow this schema exactly:
Spec Header
# Research Spec: <Topic>
> Generated: YYYY-MM-DD
> North Star: <one sentence>
> Scope: <N> stages, estimated <M> sessions
> Source: de-anthropocentric-research-engine
Global Sections
- Global Context Protocol (context-init/checkpoint rules)
- Global Execution Rules (±10% deviation, backtrack confirmation)
- Global Backtrack Conditions
Per-Stage Structure
For EACH stage, write ALL of these fields:
- Objective: What this stage accomplishes
- Expected Input: What context is available from prior stages
- Focus Areas: Specific aspects to emphasize
- Recommended Combination: campaign → strategy-A, strategy-B
- Completion Criteria: Quantified threshold (numeric or objectively verifiable)
- Backtrack Condition: if [condition], → Stage N (requires user confirmation)
- Execution Steps: Checkbox items (context-init, each strategy, checkpoints)
Granularity Rules
- Name specific strategies (not tactics/SOPs — those are CC's choice at execution time)
- Describe what topic/aspect each strategy addresses
- Specify what prior context is available and how to use it
- Quantify ALL completion criteria (no vague "sufficient" or "adequate")
- Focus Areas tell CC what to prioritize within the campaign's scope
ARA Closing Stage (when present)
When the outline includes an ara-from-context stage, write its Execution Steps so the
stage opens with an explicit user-decision gate, NOT an automatic transition:
- First step: after experiment-execution's evaluation reports PASS, present to the user: "实验评估通过,是否进入 ARA 成文?(compile results into an ARA)" — proceed only on approval.
- Do NOT hard-code which EE evaluation skill produces that PASS; the executing agent reads the spec's experiment-execution stage and the research-catalog to choose it at run time.
- The gate is an ordinary natural-language Execution Step (spec = trace). Do not invent a new spec field, and do not reuse the Backtrack Condition mechanism (that is for retreat, this is a forward go/no-go decision).
- Remaining steps: invoke
ara-from-context(context-review → compile-and-review), producingara/+ara/level2_report.json. Note the external prerequisite:npx @ara-commons/ara-skillsmust be installed (compiler + rigor-reviewer).
Step 5: Spec Self-Review
Invoke spec-self-review SOP. This is MANDATORY and cannot be skipped.
Step 6: User Review
Present the completed spec to the user for review. Wait for approval or change requests. If changes requested, revise and re-run self-review.
Output
Save the spec to: docs/de-anthropocentric/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-spec.md
Inform the user: "Spec complete. To execute, invoke executing-specs with the path to this spec file."
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| campaign-selection | Structured questioning SOP to determine which campaigns to include, emphasize, or skip. Used during spec generation. |
| constraint-elicitation | Structured questioning SOP to identify practical constraints that shape the research spec. Used during spec generation. |
| research-catalog | Capability menu for the research engine. Lists the 10 freely-composable research packages, what each does, when to reach for it, and a pointer to its full skill table. Read this after north-star crystallization to decide which packages to use — no fixed order. Also serves as the skill-index (capability map). |
| scope-clarification | Structured questioning SOP to determine research boundaries, depth, and breadth. Used during spec generation. |
| spec-self-review | Quality gate for Research Specs. Checks for placeholders, consistency, scope, ambiguity, context protocol, and quantification. Mandatory before user review. |
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the writing-specs source document cover?
You are generating a Research Spec — a document that is simultaneously human-readable and machine-executable. Another CC session will later read this spec and execute it step by step.
How do I install writing-specs?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill "skills/writing-specs". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
whiteguo233/OpenBiliClaw
writing-specs
Use when authoring a spec or implementation plan, or planning multi-task work.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
churn-prevention
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist