What is agent-eval?
编码代理(Claude Code、Aider、Codex等)在自定义任务上的直接比较,包含通过率、成本、时间和一致性指标
affaan-m/ECC
编码代理(Claude Code、Aider、Codex等)在自定义任务上的直接比较,包含通过率、成本、时间和一致性指标
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/agent-eval"Quick start
Install it or open the source, trigger it with a clear task, then follow the source workflow.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/agent-eval"Use agent-eval to help me with: [describe your task]. Before you begin, tell me what input you need, the steps you will follow, and the expected output.
No structured workflow was detected; follow the original SKILL.md below.
Continue to the workflowDirect answers
编码代理(Claude Code、Aider、Codex等)在自定义任务上的直接比较,包含通过率、成本、时间和一致性指标
It is relevant to workflows involving Engineering.
SkillSignal detected this source-specific command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/agent-eval". Inspect the repository and command before running it.
codex, claude code
Static analysis detected network signals. Review the cited source lines before installing; these signals are not a security audit.
This page combines upstream documentation with deterministic repository, quality, and static-risk signals. It is not described as a manual test or security review.
SkillSignal brief
编码代理(Claude Code、Aider、Codex等)在自定义任务上的直接比较,包含通过率、成本、时间和一致性指标
Useful in these contexts
Core capabilities
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
カスタムタスクでコーディングエージェント(Claude Code、Aider、Codex など)をヘッドツーヘッドで比較し、合格率、コスト、時間、一貫性のメトリクスを測定します
Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.
Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.
Deploy applications to Render by analyzing codebases, generating render.yaml Blueprints, and providing Dashboard deeplinks. Use when the user wants to deploy, host, publish, or set up their application on Render's cloud platform.
一个轻量级 CLI 工具,用于在可复现的任务上对编码代理进行头对头比较。每个“哪个编码代理最好?”的比较都基于感觉——本工具将其系统化。
# pinned to v0.1.0 — latest stable commit
pip install git+https://github.com/joaquinhuigomez/agent-eval.git@6d062a2f5cda6ea443bf5d458d361892c04e749b
以声明方式定义任务。每个任务指定要做什么、要修改哪些文件以及如何判断成功:
name: add-retry-logic
description: Add exponential backoff retry to the HTTP client
repo: ./my-project
files:
- src/http_client.py
prompt: |
Add retry logic with exponential backoff to all HTTP requests.
Max 3 retries. Initial delay 1s, max delay 30s.
judge:
- type: pytest
command: pytest tests/test_http_client.py -v
- type: grep
pattern: "exponential_backoff|retry"
files: src/http_client.py
commit: "abc1234" # pin to specific commit for reproducibility
每个代理运行都获得自己的 git 工作树——无需 Docker。这提供了可复现的隔离,使得代理之间不会相互干扰或损坏基础仓库。
| 指标 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|
| 通过率 | 代理生成的代码是否通过了判断? |
| 成本 | 每个任务的 API 花费(如果可用) |
| 时间 | 完成所需的挂钟秒数 |
| 一致性 | 跨重复运行的通过率(例如,3/3 = 100%) |
创建一个 tasks/ 目录,其中包含 YAML 文件,每个任务一个文件:
mkdir tasks
# Write task definitions (see template above)
针对你的任务执行代理:
agent-eval run --task tasks/add-retry-logic.yaml --agent claude-code --agent aider --runs 3
每次运行:
生成比较报告:
agent-eval report --format table
Task: add-retry-logic (3 runs each)
┌──────────────┬───────────┬────────┬────────┬─────────────┐
│ Agent │ Pass Rate │ Cost │ Time │ Consistency │
├──────────────┼───────────┼────────┼────────┼─────────────┤
│ claude-code │ 3/3 │ $0.12 │ 45s │ 100% │
│ aider │ 2/3 │ $0.08 │ 38s │ 67% │
└──────────────┴───────────┴────────┴────────┴─────────────┘
judge:
- type: pytest
command: pytest tests/ -v
- type: command
command: npm run build
judge:
- type: grep
pattern: "class.*Retry"
files: src/**/*.py
judge:
- type: llm
prompt: |
Does this implementation correctly handle exponential backoff?
Check for: max retries, increasing delays, jitter.