affaan-m/ECC

deployment-patterns

Deployment workflows, CI/CD pipeline patterns, Docker containerization, health checks, rollback strategies, and production readiness checklists for web applications. Use when setting up deployment infrastructure or planning releases.

84CollectingNetwork accessRuns scripts
See how to use itView GitHub source
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/deployment-patterns"
Automated source guide

Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026

Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md

Turn deployment-patterns's source instructions into a guide you can follow

According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: Production deployment workflows and CI/CD best practices.

npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/deployment-patterns"
Check the pinned source

Best fit

  • Setting up CI/CD pipelines
  • Dockerizing applications
  • Planning deployment strategies

Bring this context

  • A concrete task that matches the documented purpose of deployment-patterns.
  • The files, examples, or context the task depends on.
  • Your constraints, target environment, and definition of done.

Expected outputs

  • Blue (v1) idle (becomes standby) Green (v2) ← traffic
  • v1: 95% of traffic v2: 5% of traffic (canary)

Key source sections

Read deployment-patterns through these 5 source sections

Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.

01

After verification:

Blue (v1) idle (becomes standby) Green (v2) ← traffic

SKILL.md · After verification:
Blue (v1) idle (becomes standby) Green (v2) ← trafficv1: 95% of traffic v2: 5% of traffic (canary)
02

Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)

Review the “Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)” section in the pinned source before continuing.

SKILL.md · Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)
Review and apply the “Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)” source section.
03

Stage 1: Install dependencies

FROM node:22-alpine AS deps WORKDIR /app COPY package.json package-lock.json ./ RUN npm ci --production=false

SKILL.md · Stage 1: Install dependencies
FROM node:22-alpine AS deps WORKDIR /app COPY package.json package-lock.json ./ RUN npm ci --production=false
04

Stage 2: Build

FROM node:22-alpine AS builder WORKDIR /app COPY --from=deps /app/nodemodules ./nodemodules COPY . . RUN npm run build RUN npm prune --production

SKILL.md · Stage 2: Build
FROM node:22-alpine AS builder WORKDIR /app COPY --from=deps /app/nodemodules ./nodemodules COPY . . RUN npm run build RUN npm prune --production
05

Stage 3: Production image

FROM node:22-alpine AS runner WORKDIR /app

SKILL.md · Stage 3: Production image
FROM node:22-alpine AS runner WORKDIR /appRUN addgroup -g 1001 -S appgroup && adduser -S appuser -u 1001 USER appuserCOPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/nodemodules ./nodemodules COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/dist ./dist COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/package.json ./

SkillSignal prompt templates

Provide the task, context, and acceptance criteria

These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.

Task-start prompt

Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.

Use deployment-patterns to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.

Source-guided execution

Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.

Apply the pinned deployment-patterns source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “After verification:”, “Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)”, “Stage 1: Install dependencies”, “Stage 2: Build”, “Stage 3: Production image”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].

Result-review prompt

Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.

Review the current deployment-patterns result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.

Output checklist

Verify each item before delivery

The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.

The source section “After verification:” has been checked.

The source section “Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)” has been checked.

The source section “Stage 1: Install dependencies” has been checked.

The source section “Stage 2: Build” has been checked.

Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.

Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.

Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.

Choose a different workflow

When another Skill is the better fit

FAQ

What does deployment-patterns do?

Production deployment workflows and CI/CD best practices.

How do I start using deployment-patterns?

The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/deployment-patterns". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which Agent platforms does it declare?

No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.

Repository stars
234,327
Repository forks
35,711
Quality
84/100
Source repository last pushed

Quality breakdown

Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.

84/100
Documentation30/30
Specificity16/25
Maintenance20/20
Trust signals18/25
View original Skill.mdThis page is parsed directly from the repository SKILL.md without editorial rewriting. Collected: Jul 28, 2026 · about 2 min

Deployment Patterns

Production deployment workflows and CI/CD best practices.

When to Activate

  • Setting up CI/CD pipelines
  • Dockerizing an application
  • Planning deployment strategy (blue-green, canary, rolling)
  • Implementing health checks and readiness probes
  • Preparing for a production release
  • Configuring environment-specific settings

Deployment Strategies

Rolling Deployment (Default)

Replace instances gradually — old and new versions run simultaneously during rollout.

Instance 1: v1 → v2  (update first)
Instance 2: v1        (still running v1)
Instance 3: v1        (still running v1)

Instance 1: v2
Instance 2: v1 → v2  (update second)
Instance 3: v1

Instance 1: v2
Instance 2: v2
Instance 3: v1 → v2  (update last)

Pros: Zero downtime, gradual rollout Cons: Two versions run simultaneously — requires backward-compatible changes Use when: Standard deployments, backward-compatible changes

Blue-Green Deployment

Run two identical environments. Switch traffic atomically.

Blue  (v1) ← traffic
Green (v2)   idle, running new version

# After verification:
Blue  (v1)   idle (becomes standby)
Green (v2) ← traffic

Pros: Instant rollback (switch back to blue), clean cutover Cons: Requires 2x infrastructure during deployment Use when: Critical services, zero-tolerance for issues

Canary Deployment

Route a small percentage of traffic to the new version first.

v1: 95% of traffic
v2:  5% of traffic  (canary)

# If metrics look good:
v1: 50% of traffic
v2: 50% of traffic

# Final:
v2: 100% of traffic

Pros: Catches issues with real traffic before full rollout Cons: Requires traffic splitting infrastructure, monitoring Use when: High-traffic services, risky changes, feature flags

Docker

Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Node.js)

# Stage 1: Install dependencies
FROM node:22-alpine AS deps
WORKDIR /app
COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
RUN npm ci --production=false

# Stage 2: Build
FROM node:22-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY . .
RUN npm run build
RUN npm prune --production

# Stage 3: Production image
FROM node:22-alpine AS runner
WORKDIR /app

RUN addgroup -g 1001 -S appgroup && adduser -S appuser -u 1001
USER appuser

COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/dist ./dist
COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/package.json ./

ENV NODE_ENV=production
EXPOSE 3000

HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \
  CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:3000/health || exit 1

CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"]

Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Go)

FROM golang:1.22-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY go.mod go.sum ./
RUN go mod download
COPY . .
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -ldflags="-s -w" -o /server ./cmd/server

FROM alpine:3.19 AS runner
RUN apk --no-cache add ca-certificates
RUN adduser -D -u 1001 appuser
USER appuser

COPY --from=builder /server /server

EXPOSE 8080
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s CMD wget -qO- http://localhost:8080/health || exit 1
CMD ["/server"]

Multi-Stage Dockerfile (Python/Django)

FROM python:3.12-slim AS builder
WORKDIR /app
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir uv
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN uv pip install --system --no-cache -r requirements.txt

FROM python:3.12-slim AS runner
WORKDIR /app

RUN useradd -r -u 1001 appuser
USER appuser

COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages
COPY --from=builder /usr/local/bin /usr/local/bin
COPY . .

ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
EXPOSE 8000

HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s CMD python -c "import urllib.request; urllib.request.urlopen('http://localhost:8000/health/')" || exit 1
CMD ["gunicorn", "config.wsgi:application", "--bind", "0.0.0.0:8000", "--workers", "4"]

Docker Best Practices

# GOOD practices
- Use specific version tags (node:22-alpine, not node:latest)
- Multi-stage builds to minimize image size
- Run as non-root user
- Copy dependency files first (layer caching)
- Use .dockerignore to exclude node_modules, .git, tests
- Add HEALTHCHECK instruction
- Set resource limits in docker-compose or k8s

# BAD practices
- Running as root
- Using :latest tags
- Copying entire repo in one COPY layer
- Installing dev dependencies in production image
- Storing secrets in image (use env vars or secrets manager)

CI/CD Pipeline

GitHub Actions (Standard Pipeline)

name: CI/CD

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: 22
          cache: npm
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm run typecheck
      - run: npm test -- --coverage
      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        if: always()
        with:
          name: coverage
          path: coverage/

  build:
    needs: test
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
      - uses: docker/login-action@v3
        with:
          registry: ghcr.io
          username: ${{ github.actor }}
          password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
      - uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
        with:
          push: true
          tags: ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }}
          cache-from: type=gha
          cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

  deploy:
    needs: build
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    environment: production
    steps:
      - name: Deploy to production
        run: |
          # Platform-specific deployment command
          # Railway: railway up
          # Vercel: vercel --prod
          # K8s: kubectl set image deployment/app app=ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }}
          echo "Deploying ${{ github.sha }}"

Pipeline Stages

PR opened:
  lint → typecheck → unit tests → integration tests → preview deploy

Merged to main:
  lint → typecheck → unit tests → integration tests → build image → deploy staging → smoke tests → deploy production

Health Checks

Health Check Endpoint

// Simple health check
app.get("/health", (req, res) => {
  res.status(200).json({ status: "ok" });
});

// Detailed health check (for internal monitoring)
app.get("/health/detailed", async (req, res) => {
  const checks = {
    database: await checkDatabase(),
    redis: await checkRedis(),
    externalApi: await checkExternalApi(),
  };

  const allHealthy = Object.values(checks).every(c => c.status === "ok");

  res.status(allHealthy ? 200 : 503).json({
    status: allHealthy ? "ok" : "degraded",
    timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
    version: process.env.APP_VERSION || "unknown",
    uptime: process.uptime(),
    checks,
  });
});

async function checkDatabase(): Promise<HealthCheck> {
  try {
    await db.query("SELECT 1");
    return { status: "ok", latency_ms: 2 };
  } catch (err) {
    return { status: "error", message: "Database unreachable" };
  }
}

Kubernetes Probes

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: 3000
  initialDelaySeconds: 10
  periodSeconds: 30
  failureThreshold: 3

readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: 3000
  initialDelaySeconds: 5
  periodSeconds: 10
  failureThreshold: 2

startupProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health
    port: 3000
  initialDelaySeconds: 0
  periodSeconds: 5
  failureThreshold: 30    # 30 * 5s = 150s max startup time

Environment Configuration

Twelve-Factor App Pattern

# All config via environment variables — never in code
DATABASE_URL=postgres://user:pass@host:5432/db
REDIS_URL=redis://host:6379/0
API_KEY=${API_KEY}           # injected by secrets manager
LOG_LEVEL=info
PORT=3000

# Environment-specific behavior
NODE_ENV=production          # or staging, development
APP_ENV=production           # explicit app environment

Configuration Validation

import { z } from "zod";

const envSchema = z.object({
  NODE_ENV: z.enum(["development", "staging", "production"]),
  PORT: z.coerce.number().default(3000),
  DATABASE_URL: z.string().url(),
  REDIS_URL: z.string().url(),
  JWT_SECRET: z.string().min(32),
  LOG_LEVEL: z.enum(["debug", "info", "warn", "error"]).default("info"),
});

// Validate at startup — fail fast if config is wrong
export const env = envSchema.parse(process.env);

Rollback Strategy

Instant Rollback

# Docker/Kubernetes: point to previous image
kubectl rollout undo deployment/app

# Vercel: promote previous deployment
vercel rollback

# Railway: redeploy previous commit
railway up --commit <previous-sha>

# Database: rollback migration (if reversible)
npx prisma migrate resolve --rolled-back <migration-name>

Rollback Checklist

  • Previous image/artifact is available and tagged
  • Database migrations are backward-compatible (no destructive changes)
  • Feature flags can disable new features without deploy
  • Monitoring alerts configured for error rate spikes
  • Rollback tested in staging before production release

Production Readiness Checklist

Before any production deployment:

Application

  • All tests pass (unit, integration, E2E)
  • No hardcoded secrets in code or config files
  • Error handling covers all edge cases
  • Logging is structured (JSON) and does not contain PII
  • Health check endpoint returns meaningful status

Infrastructure

  • Docker image builds reproducibly (pinned versions)
  • Environment variables documented and validated at startup
  • Resource limits set (CPU, memory)
  • Horizontal scaling configured (min/max instances)
  • SSL/TLS enabled on all endpoints

Monitoring

  • Application metrics exported (request rate, latency, errors)
  • Alerts configured for error rate > threshold
  • Log aggregation set up (structured logs, searchable)
  • Uptime monitoring on health endpoint

Security

  • Dependencies scanned for CVEs
  • CORS configured for allowed origins only
  • Rate limiting enabled on public endpoints
  • Authentication and authorization verified
  • Security headers set (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)

Operations

  • Rollback plan documented and tested
  • Database migration tested against production-sized data
  • Runbook for common failure scenarios
  • On-call rotation and escalation path defined

When to Use This Skill

  • Setting up CI/CD pipelines
  • Dockerizing applications
  • Planning deployment strategies
  • Implementing health checks
  • Preparing for production releases
  • Troubleshooting deployment issues
Source repo
affaan-m/ECC
Skill path
.kiro/skills/deployment-patterns/SKILL.md
Commit SHA
4e973d3eaf92
Repository license
MIT
Data collected